Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

instrument.ru

Мир Инструмента

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

775 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

486 ms

instrument.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to instrument.ru homepage info - get ready to check Instrument best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about instrument.ru

Оптовая продажа отделочного, режущего, измерительного, столярного и другого инструмента, продажа силового оборудования, расходных материалов и сопутствующих товаров для ремонта. Садовый инвентарь и то...

Visit instrument.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Instrument.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 775 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

instrument.ru performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,440 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.444

21/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

instrument.ru

775 ms

default.css

187 ms

waslidemenu.css

194 ms

fontface.css

195 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

290 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Instrument.ru, 1% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Instrument.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 313.9 kB (12%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Instrument.ru main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 76.6 kB

  • Original 86.2 kB
  • After minification 57.0 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.2 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 146.8 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Instrument images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 90.5 kB

  • Original 110.7 kB
  • After minification 82.4 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Instrument.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (17%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

71

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Instrument. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

instrument.ru accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

instrument.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

instrument.ru SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Instrument.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Instrument.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Instrument. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: