Tools & Wizards About Us
insulgard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

insulgard.com

Bullet Resistant Security Windows | Insulgard

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

215 ms

Resources Loaded

795 ms

Page Rendered

524 ms

insulgard.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to insulgard.com homepage info - get ready to check Insulgard best content right away, or after learning these important things about insulgard.com

Leaders in delivering security and threat solutions for bullet, wind and impact. Specializing in doors, windows, glass, enclosures, and accessories.

Visit insulgard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Insulgard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

insulgard.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,920 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.27

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

insulgard.com

215 ms

www.insulgard.com

156 ms

style.css

13 ms

style.css

28 ms

flexslider.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Insulgard.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (273 ms) belongs to the original domain Insulgard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 135.4 kB (31%)

Content Size

440.2 kB

After Optimization

304.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Insulgard.com main page is 440.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 208.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 93.9 kB

  • Original 116.1 kB
  • After minification 109.8 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 690 B
  • After minification 690 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Insulgard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 208.3 kB
  • After minification 208.2 kB
  • After compression 198.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 31.9 kB

  • Original 115.1 kB
  • After minification 115.1 kB
  • After compression 83.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Insulgard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (93%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Insulgard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

insulgard.com

insulgard.com

215 ms

www.insulgard.com

www.insulgard.com

156 ms

style.css

style.css

13 ms

style.css

style.css

28 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

31 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

33 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

32 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

31 ms

style.css

style.css

29 ms

ft.css

ft.css

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

40 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

86 ms

main.js

main.js

86 ms

js.cookie.js

js.cookie.js

86 ms

handl-utm-grabber.js

handl-utm-grabber.js

86 ms

signup-form-widget.min.js

signup-form-widget.min.js

90 ms

js

js

194 ms

4526694.js

4526694.js

107 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

107 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

104 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

108 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

112 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

111 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

111 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

111 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

111 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

111 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

127 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

133 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

126 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

125 ms

global.js

global.js

126 ms

vendor.js

vendor.js

126 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

192 ms

jquery.lazy.plugins.min.js

jquery.lazy.plugins.min.js

192 ms

14525711.js

14525711.js

192 ms

e-202435.js

e-202435.js

107 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

148 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

195 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

195 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

178 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

181 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

183 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

179 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

168 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

68 ms

lato-v15-latin-regular.woff

lato-v15-latin-regular.woff

273 ms

underscore-min.js

underscore-min.js

116 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

143 ms

Accessibility Review

insulgard.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

insulgard.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

insulgard.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Insulgard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Insulgard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

insulgard.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Insulgard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: