Tools & Wizards About Us
intactwebdesign.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

intactwebdesign.com

Full-Service Web & Mobile Application Development Company in USA | IntactWebDesign

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

intactwebdesign.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Intact Web Design content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intactwebdesign.com

IntactWebDesign is a top-notch web & app development company, offering full-length digital & development solutions in California and all across in United States. Contact us to improve your online busi...

Visit intactwebdesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intactwebdesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intactwebdesign.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intactwebdesign.com

108 ms

intactwebdesign.com

210 ms

layout.css

62 ms

main-style.css

110 ms

responsive-new.css

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original Intactwebdesign.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (567 ms) belongs to the original domain Intactwebdesign.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 624.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

9.0 MB

After Optimization

8.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intactwebdesign.com main page is 9.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 87.8 kB

  • Original 96.7 kB
  • After minification 48.0 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 48.8 kB, which is 50% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.8 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 484.4 kB

  • Original 8.8 MB
  • After minification 8.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intact Web Design images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 120.2 kB
  • After minification 120.1 kB
  • After compression 118.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

  • Original 54.6 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intactwebdesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 93% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (23%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

75

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intact Web Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intactwebdesign.com

intactwebdesign.com

108 ms

intactwebdesign.com

intactwebdesign.com

210 ms

layout.css

layout.css

62 ms

main-style.css

main-style.css

110 ms

responsive-new.css

responsive-new.css

109 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

42 ms

css.css

css.css

123 ms

js

js

82 ms

DMCABadgeHelper.min.js

DMCABadgeHelper.min.js

79 ms

plugin.js

plugin.js

206 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

113 ms

custom.js

custom.js

114 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

44 ms

css2

css2

29 ms

css2

css2

41 ms

css2

css2

45 ms

221 ms

dmca_protected_sml_120m.png

dmca_protected_sml_120m.png

175 ms

logo-white.svg

logo-white.svg

288 ms

phone-ico.png

phone-ico.png

185 ms

banner-img.jpg

banner-img.jpg

184 ms

mob-frame.png

mob-frame.png

263 ms

banner-laptop.png

banner-laptop.png

548 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

186 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

551 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

552 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

222 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

263 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

552 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

550 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

553 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

551 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

553 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

559 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

556 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

554 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

555 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

556 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

557 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

557 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

559 ms

1.png

1.png

560 ms

2.png

2.png

561 ms

3.png

3.png

562 ms

4.png

4.png

563 ms

5.png

5.png

564 ms

6.png

6.png

562 ms

7.png

7.png

564 ms

8.png

8.png

565 ms

9.png

9.png

566 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

566 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

567 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

567 ms

api.ipify.org

api.ipify.org

429 ms

53 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

401 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

54 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

67 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

75 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50Xew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50Xew8.ttf

74 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

26 ms

MarkPro-Heavy.woff

MarkPro-Heavy.woff

389 ms

MarkPro-Bold.woff

MarkPro-Bold.woff

388 ms

MarkPro-Medium.woff

MarkPro-Medium.woff

389 ms

50 ms

MarkPro.woff

MarkPro.woff

355 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

312 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

312 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

52 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

49 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

49 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

49 ms

1.png

1.png

55 ms

2.png

2.png

48 ms

3.png

3.png

55 ms

4.png

4.png

54 ms

5.png

5.png

56 ms

6.png

6.png

60 ms

7.png

7.png

63 ms

8.png

8.png

89 ms

9.png

9.png

77 ms

phone-circle-ico.png

phone-circle-ico.png

86 ms

chat-ico.png

chat-ico.png

92 ms

ico-1.svg

ico-1.svg

93 ms

ico-2.svg

ico-2.svg

86 ms

ico-3.svg

ico-3.svg

99 ms

ico-4.svg

ico-4.svg

106 ms

ico-5.svg

ico-5.svg

128 ms

ico-6.svg

ico-6.svg

108 ms

ico-7.svg

ico-7.svg

130 ms

ico-8.svg

ico-8.svg

110 ms

test-bg.png

test-bg.png

124 ms

test-img-left.png

test-img-left.png

127 ms

text-ico02.png

text-ico02.png

132 ms

text-ico01.png

text-ico01.png

139 ms

text-ico03.png

text-ico03.png

146 ms

tesst-bg.png

tesst-bg.png

146 ms

test-ico-con.png

test-ico-con.png

148 ms

girl.png

girl.png

157 ms

cta-call.png

cta-call.png

158 ms

cta-chat.png

cta-chat.png

161 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

170 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

281 ms

footer-phone.png

footer-phone.png

151 ms

footer-email.png

footer-email.png

158 ms

footer-map.png

footer-map.png

158 ms

close-popup.png

close-popup.png

162 ms

user.png

user.png

169 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

170 ms

phone.png

phone.png

179 ms

email.png

email.png

175 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

26 ms

Accessibility Review

intactwebdesign.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

intactwebdesign.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

intactwebdesign.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intactwebdesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Intactwebdesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intactwebdesign.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intact Web Design. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: