10.4 sec in total
2.8 sec
7.2 sec
409 ms
Click here to check amazing Intarget content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intarget.mobi
InTarget, a mobile advertising and marketing specialist in Africa and the Middle East. We'll show you the Power of Mobile with your next marketing campaign
Visit intarget.mobiWe analyzed Intarget.mobi page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
intarget.mobi performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
15/100
10%
Value600 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.173
69/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
2793 ms
36 ms
245 ms
480 ms
480 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Intarget.mobi, 6% (6 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net and 5% (5 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Intarget.mobi.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (39%)
4.7 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Intarget.mobi main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 332.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 332.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intarget images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 311.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intarget.mobi needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 311.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (74%)
87
23
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intarget. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intarget.mobi
2793 ms
shareaholic.js
36 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
245 ms
style.css
480 ms
icons.css
480 ms
styles.css
481 ms
font-awesome.css
13 ms
pagenavi-css.css
481 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
736 ms
shortcodes.css
481 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
717 ms
jquery.js
1202 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
717 ms
addthis_widget.js
15 ms
output.css
715 ms
plugin.css
718 ms
core.min.js
954 ms
widget.min.js
954 ms
tabs.min.js
955 ms
jquery.form.min.js
958 ms
scripts.js
970 ms
scroll-back-to-top.js
1192 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1193 ms
waypoints.min.js
1194 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
1284 ms
custom.js
1284 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1444 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
1499 ms
53aaccb08273920c188593f505e20ac8.json
139 ms
analytics.js
68 ms
intarget-logo1.jpg
451 ms
shutterstock_262335101.jpg
2229 ms
compose1.png
450 ms
smartphone1.png
451 ms
chat1.png
522 ms
eye.png
522 ms
frames.png
524 ms
genius.png
523 ms
pinpoint.png
727 ms
woman-bg.jpg
1471 ms
css
148 ms
shrMain.min.js
63 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
94 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
143 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
153 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
155 ms
ETmodules.ttf
1658 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
91 ms
collect
73 ms
collect
134 ms
collect
53 ms
jquery.min.js
55 ms
300lo.json
82 ms
shutterstock_262335080.jpg
2735 ms
shutterstock_262335071.jpg
2719 ms
pageview.gif
36 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
38 ms
vglnk.js
6 ms
partners.js
117 ms
pixel.gif
8 ms
pixel.gif
8 ms
2226
46 ms
sholic.js
6 ms
usermatch
37 ms
beacon.js
12 ms
cms-sh2c.html
96 ms
eexelate.js
8 ms
13 ms
ep
12 ms
ep
9 ms
pixel
18 ms
usermatch
20 ms
74 ms
VtY6CcAoJH4AAHffqYYAAAEk%26407
165 ms
pm_match
129 ms
483 ms
i.gif
170 ms
blank.html
142 ms
ping_match.gif
99 ms
net.php
44 ms
pixel
34 ms
2964
45 ms
pixel
48 ms
crum
68 ms
cfcm.ashx
19 ms
rum
85 ms
generic
26 ms
crum
67 ms
cse
390 ms
pixel
60 ms
ermcm
58 ms
m
63 ms
match-result
53 ms
pixel.gif
29 ms
xrefid.xgi
15 ms
pixel.gif
27 ms
rs
18 ms
crum
20 ms
layers.648fb6c882fbeb98be27.js
9 ms
ping
24 ms
crum
10 ms
domains
45 ms
xrefid.xgi
7 ms
intarget.mobi accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intarget.mobi best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
intarget.mobi SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intarget.mobi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intarget.mobi main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intarget.mobi
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intarget. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: