Tools & Wizards About Us
intechnica.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

intechnica.co.uk

Crosslake: private equity tech due diligence advisor - Crosslake

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

294 ms

intechnica.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intechnica.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check In Tech Nica best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about intechnica.co.uk

Crosslake is a global advisory providing tech due diligence and value creation services for private equity investors and portfolio companies.

Visit intechnica.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Intechnica.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intechnica.co.uk performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intechnica.com

28 ms

crosslaketech.com

230 ms

ivory-search.min.css

38 ms

style.min.css

40 ms

theme.min.css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Intechnica.co.uk, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Intechnica.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (418 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intechnica.co.uk main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 136.5 kB

  • Original 163.9 kB
  • After minification 159.5 kB
  • After compression 27.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. In Tech Nica images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 206.5 kB
  • After minification 206.5 kB
  • After compression 205.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 197.3 kB
  • After minification 196.9 kB
  • After compression 195.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intechnica.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (79%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In Tech Nica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intechnica.com

intechnica.com

28 ms

crosslaketech.com

crosslaketech.com

230 ms

ivory-search.min.css

ivory-search.min.css

38 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

40 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

26 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

37 ms

custom-frontend.min.css

custom-frontend.min.css

30 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

36 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

41 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

78 ms

custom-pro-frontend.min.css

custom-pro-frontend.min.css

64 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

79 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

50 ms

global.css

global.css

59 ms

post-287.css

post-287.css

53 ms

post-340.css

post-340.css

76 ms

post-351.css

post-351.css

77 ms

post-10574.css

post-10574.css

81 ms

post-396.css

post-396.css

86 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

87 ms

style.css

style.css

83 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

95 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

83 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

92 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

112 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

112 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

121 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

120 ms

js

js

84 ms

css2

css2

52 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

144 ms

animate.css

animate.css

168 ms

jquery-3.7.1.slim.min.js

jquery-3.7.1.slim.min.js

36 ms

post-10554.css

post-10554.css

199 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

143 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

164 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

212 ms

ivory-search.min.js

ivory-search.min.js

211 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

211 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

223 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

225 ms

mega_slider.js

mega_slider.js

208 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

201 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

199 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

200 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

201 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

200 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

199 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

185 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

188 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

183 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

168 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

168 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

169 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

166 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

165 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

167 ms

t.js

t.js

381 ms

crosslake-logo-128x24-4x.png

crosslake-logo-128x24-4x.png

225 ms

crosslake-logo-128x24-4x.png

crosslake-logo-128x24-4x.png

220 ms

crosslake-logo-mark.svg

crosslake-logo-mark.svg

220 ms

crosslake-home1-150x112.png

crosslake-home1-150x112.png

225 ms

crosslake-home2-150x112.png

crosslake-home2-150x112.png

221 ms

crosslake-home3-150x112.png

crosslake-home3-150x112.png

222 ms

crosslake-home4-150x112.png

crosslake-home4-150x112.png

221 ms

crosslake-home5-150x112.png

crosslake-home5-150x112.png

222 ms

Corsis-Macbook.png

Corsis-Macbook.png

223 ms

CL-MA-Lifecycle-trimmed-1024x901.png

CL-MA-Lifecycle-trimmed-1024x901.png

221 ms

Artboard-1@4x.png

Artboard-1@4x.png

226 ms

iStock-1216403160-Home-ADJ-2470x1870-1.jpg

iStock-1216403160-Home-ADJ-2470x1870-1.jpg

169 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

139 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

292 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

291 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

405 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

418 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

175 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

245 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

233 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZhrib2Au-0.ttf

274 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

65 ms

Accessibility Review

intechnica.co.uk accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

intechnica.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

intechnica.co.uk SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intechnica.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intechnica.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intechnica.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of In Tech Nica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: