Tools & Wizards About Us
integration-x.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

integration-x.com

Ad Ops Creative Management and Page Planning

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

35 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

345 ms

integration-x.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to integration-x.com homepage info - get ready to check Integration X best content right away, or after learning these important things about integration-x.com

Our Creative Management and Page Planning solutions offer media production automation for ad ops and pagination.

Visit integration-x.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Integration-x.com page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

integration-x.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.8 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

integration-x.com

35 ms

integration-x.com

45 ms

cv.css

16 ms

cvpro.min.css

55 ms

style.min.css

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Integration-x.com, 47% (28 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 14% (8 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (941 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 603.8 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

742.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Integration-x.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 483.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 128.0 kB

  • Original 157.8 kB
  • After minification 155.8 kB
  • After compression 29.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 222 B

  • Original 398.8 kB
  • After minification 398.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Integration X images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 124.5 kB

  • Original 307.0 kB
  • After minification 307.0 kB
  • After compression 182.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.5 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 351.1 kB

  • Original 483.0 kB
  • After minification 475.3 kB
  • After compression 131.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Integration-x.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 351.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (37%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Integration X. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

integration-x.com

integration-x.com

35 ms

integration-x.com

integration-x.com

45 ms

cv.css

cv.css

16 ms

cvpro.min.css

cvpro.min.css

55 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

76 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

75 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

79 ms

avia-merged-styles-b7712d58b5ba327d8796f0ba5956d0ba---66b217560d202.css

avia-merged-styles-b7712d58b5ba327d8796f0ba5956d0ba---66b217560d202.css

79 ms

post-11902.css

post-11902.css

57 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

69 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

77 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

73 ms

avia-head-scripts-edd06130660a1a8c6ef0e0c2c0b543fd---669a4cf9ed4ed.js

avia-head-scripts-edd06130660a1a8c6ef0e0c2c0b543fd---669a4cf9ed4ed.js

66 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

289 ms

cv.js

cv.js

63 ms

cvpro.min.js

cvpro.min.js

74 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

288 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

288 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

307 ms

e-202432.js

e-202432.js

321 ms

avia-footer-scripts-0a58b3f415cca7e684c62eaf5dbcb997---669a4d1279799.js

avia-footer-scripts-0a58b3f415cca7e684c62eaf5dbcb997---669a4d1279799.js

322 ms

Logo-340x156-1-300x138.png

Logo-340x156-1-300x138.png

332 ms

Creative-Management.png

Creative-Management.png

941 ms

Page-Planning.png

Page-Planning.png

880 ms

X1-log-in-e1718201321862.png

X1-log-in-e1718201321862.png

256 ms

X1-logo-negative_small-e1722950579321.png

X1-logo-negative_small-e1722950579321.png

172 ms

LPAF2023_2.jpeg

LPAF2023_2.jpeg

198 ms

DMEXCO-2022-featured-image.png

DMEXCO-2022-featured-image.png

313 ms

ops_logo.png

ops_logo.png

407 ms

Inddpi03.png

Inddpi03.png

398 ms

logo_0000_news.png

logo_0000_news.png

287 ms

logo_0001_jfm.png

logo_0001_jfm.png

332 ms

logo_0002_rossel.png

logo_0002_rossel.png

365 ms

logo_0004_schibsted.png

logo_0004_schibsted.png

370 ms

logo_0017_twp.png

logo_0017_twp.png

444 ms

logo_0005_sanoma.png

logo_0005_sanoma.png

445 ms

dpnmedia.png

dpnmedia.png

454 ms

logo_0003_mediahuis.png

logo_0003_mediahuis.png

455 ms

logo_0007_jppol.png

logo_0007_jppol.png

458 ms

logo_0008_amedia.png

logo_0008_amedia.png

477 ms

logo_0009_polaris.png

logo_0009_polaris.png

491 ms

logo_0010_tmg.png

logo_0010_tmg.png

501 ms

logo_0011_thenational.png

logo_0011_thenational.png

488 ms

logo_0012_nordjyske.png

logo_0012_nordjyske.png

534 ms

logo_0013_otavamedia.png

logo_0013_otavamedia.png

529 ms

logo_0014_egmont.png

logo_0014_egmont.png

540 ms

logo_0015_ksf.png

logo_0015_ksf.png

526 ms

logo_0016_erdee.png

logo_0016_erdee.png

573 ms

integrations-logos_0004_aws-1.png

integrations-logos_0004_aws-1.png

616 ms

Integration-X-logo-125x23-1.png

Integration-X-logo-125x23-1.png

563 ms

sourcesanspro-regular.ttf

sourcesanspro-regular.ttf

73 ms

sourcesanspro-light.ttf

sourcesanspro-light.ttf

72 ms

sourcesanspro-extralight.ttf

sourcesanspro-extralight.ttf

106 ms

sourcesanspro-semibold.ttf

sourcesanspro-semibold.ttf

105 ms

sourcesanspro-bold.ttf

sourcesanspro-bold.ttf

114 ms

sourcesanspro-black.ttf

sourcesanspro-black.ttf

114 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

148 ms

js

js

167 ms

Logo-340x156-1-300x138.png

Logo-340x156-1-300x138.png

8 ms

Accessibility Review

integration-x.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

integration-x.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

integration-x.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Integration-x.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Integration-x.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

integration-x.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Integration X. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: