Tools & Wizards About Us
intellifer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

intellifer.com

Intellifer Systems | Industrial IoT, RTLS, Digital Transformation Solutions, IT Services and Consulting

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

598 ms

Resources Loaded

6.6 sec

Page Rendered

959 ms

intellifer.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Intellifer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intellifer.com

As the world transitions into the new digital era. We empower your digital journey in record time, powered by human centricity and transformative Industrial IoT Technology. Intellifer Systems is a Dig...

Visit intellifer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intellifer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 598 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intellifer.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.139

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intellifer.com

598 ms

intellifer.com

1298 ms

css2

26 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1709 ms

all.min.css

1495 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Intellifer.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Intellifer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (66%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intellifer.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 81.7 kB

  • Original 88.7 kB
  • After minification 27.9 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 60.7 kB, which is 68% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.7 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 2.0 MB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Intellifer needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 59% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 397.8 kB

  • Original 597.1 kB
  • After minification 594.9 kB
  • After compression 199.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 397.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 727.7 kB

  • Original 828.1 kB
  • After minification 732.7 kB
  • After compression 100.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intellifer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 727.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (33%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

40

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intellifer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intellifer.com

intellifer.com

598 ms

intellifer.com

intellifer.com

1298 ms

css2

css2

26 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1709 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1495 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

1120 ms

progressbar.css

progressbar.css

1122 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

1136 ms

master.css

master.css

2594 ms

logo-black-11.png

logo-black-11.png

1327 ms

site-logo-white-2.png

site-logo-white-2.png

1331 ms

menu-black.png

menu-black.png

1341 ms

11.png

11.png

1332 ms

12.png

12.png

1335 ms

arrow-down-sm.png

arrow-down-sm.png

1349 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

1880 ms

chevron.png

chevron.png

1543 ms

phillips.png

phillips.png

1549 ms

aramco.png

aramco.png

1563 ms

schem.png

schem.png

1809 ms

lnt.png

lnt.png

1844 ms

ksb.png

ksb.png

1853 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

2683 ms

07.jpg

07.jpg

2096 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

2097 ms

2.png

2.png

2702 ms

3.png

3.png

2102 ms

4.png

4.png

2731 ms

p01.png

p01.png

2911 ms

js

js

52 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

2361 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

2400 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

2587 ms

counter.js

counter.js

2603 ms

gsap.min.js

gsap.min.js

2875 ms

ScrollTrigger.min.js

ScrollTrigger.min.js

2687 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

2724 ms

ScrollSmoother.min.js

ScrollSmoother.min.js

2792 ms

SplitText.min.js

SplitText.min.js

2377 ms

chroma.min.js

chroma.min.js

2204 ms

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

2253 ms

main.js

main.js

2295 ms

p02.png

p02.png

2343 ms

p03.png

p03.png

3820 ms

p04.png

p04.png

2387 ms

counter-3.png

counter-3.png

2052 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

2055 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

2094 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2205 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

2298 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

2084 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

2129 ms

logo-black-1.png

logo-black-1.png

2181 ms

5.png

5.png

1359 ms

play-icon.png

play-icon.png

1389 ms

6.png

6.png

1453 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

1515 ms

02.png

02.png

1565 ms

03.png

03.png

1593 ms

04.png

04.png

1588 ms

8.png

8.png

1663 ms

bg.png

bg.png

1671 ms

nKKZ-Go6G5tXcoaR.woff

nKKZ-Go6G5tXcoaR.woff

57 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5mOCWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5mOCWj.woff

101 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4-OSWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4-OSWj.woff

125 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5KPyWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5KPyWj.woff

102 ms

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4uPiWj.woff

nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4uPiWj.woff

102 ms

js

js

108 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

67 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

1620 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

1609 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

quote.png

quote.png

1574 ms

Accessibility Review

intellifer.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

intellifer.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

intellifer.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intellifer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intellifer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intellifer.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intellifer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: