Tools & Wizards About Us
interactive.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

interactive.com

Interactive - The Power of Communication - Interactive - The Power of Communication

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

interactive.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to interactive.com homepage info - get ready to check Interactive best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about interactive.com

EchoMail provides an advanced CRM platform that uses Artificial Intelligence to help businesses grow relationships and revenue.

Visit interactive.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interactive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interactive.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interactive.com

77 ms

interactive.com

803 ms

main.min.css

73 ms

style.min.css

106 ms

styles.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Interactive.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (803 ms) belongs to the original domain Interactive.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (65%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Interactive.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 198.8 kB

  • Original 236.1 kB
  • After minification 232.3 kB
  • After compression 37.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 90.5 kB

  • Original 975.5 kB
  • After minification 885.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interactive images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 422.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 189.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interactive.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (65%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interactive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

interactive.com

interactive.com

77 ms

interactive.com

interactive.com

803 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

73 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

106 ms

styles.css

styles.css

54 ms

contact-form-7-main.min.css

contact-form-7-main.min.css

54 ms

734e5f942.min.css

734e5f942.min.css

141 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

58 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

68 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

124 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

71 ms

global.css

global.css

91 ms

post-2160.css

post-2160.css

85 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

132 ms

post-501.css

post-501.css

102 ms

htbbootstrap.css

htbbootstrap.css

109 ms

htmega-widgets.css

htmega-widgets.css

203 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

120 ms

animation.css

animation.css

165 ms

htmega-keyframes.css

htmega-keyframes.css

137 ms

css

css

33 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

167 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

164 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

169 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

170 ms

css

css

52 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

162 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

160 ms

js

js

41 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

160 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

161 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

161 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

165 ms

w-bullet.min.js

w-bullet.min.js

174 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

143 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

144 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

145 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

147 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

326 ms

index.js

index.js

327 ms

734e5f942.min.js

734e5f942.min.js

336 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

327 ms

htbbootstrap.js

htbbootstrap.js

327 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

326 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

323 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

313 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

310 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

296 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

290 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

282 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

274 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

270 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

253 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

253 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

249 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

249 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

222 ms

interactive-logo-1.jpg

interactive-logo-1.jpg

103 ms

interactive-logo-1-300x40.jpg

interactive-logo-1-300x40.jpg

102 ms

em-bannerimg.png

em-bannerimg.png

105 ms

start-btn-1b.png

start-btn-1b.png

102 ms

cslide-2.png

cslide-2.png

103 ms

cslide-1.png

cslide-1.png

103 ms

cslide-3.png

cslide-3.png

105 ms

interactive-AI-tech-review1.jpg

interactive-AI-tech-review1.jpg

106 ms

EM-AI-article1a.jpg

EM-AI-article1a.jpg

109 ms

the-future-of-email-standing_sm.png

the-future-of-email-standing_sm.png

106 ms

computerworld_logo.png

computerworld_logo.png

107 ms

fast-company-logo.png

fast-company-logo.png

107 ms

wsj_logo.png

wsj_logo.png

108 ms

email-rev-ref.png

email-rev-ref.png

110 ms

cookie_jar.png

cookie_jar.png

109 ms

hilton.png

hilton.png

108 ms

qvc.png

qvc.png

30 ms

american-express.png

american-express.png

29 ms

allstate.png

allstate.png

29 ms

guggenheim1.png

guggenheim1.png

28 ms

nike.png

nike.png

28 ms

ck.png

ck.png

28 ms

pandg.png

pandg.png

151 ms

unilever1.png

unilever1.png

150 ms

citibank.png

citibank.png

151 ms

Book-display.png

Book-display.png

149 ms

Interactive-The-Power-of-Communication.png

Interactive-The-Power-of-Communication.png

150 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

148 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

189 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

225 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

227 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

225 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

226 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

146 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

146 ms

in.php

in.php

169 ms

Accessibility Review

interactive.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

interactive.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

interactive.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interactive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interactive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

interactive.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interactive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: