Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

interactivesecuritysolutions.com

Little Rock Residential and Commercial Alarm Systems and Cameras

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

389 ms

interactivesecuritysolutions.com screenshot

About Website

Visit interactivesecuritysolutions.com now to see the best up-to-date Interactivesecuritysolutions content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interactivesecuritysolutions.com

Looking to upgrade your Little Rock home or business security system? Let the professionals from Interactive Security provide a free audit.

Visit interactivesecuritysolutions.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interactivesecuritysolutions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interactivesecuritysolutions.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.094

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interactivesecuritysolutions.com

134 ms

www.interactivesecuritysolutions.com

403 ms

jquery.min.js

43 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

93 ms

js

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Interactivesecuritysolutions.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (403 ms) belongs to the original domain Interactivesecuritysolutions.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 368.5 kB (62%)

Content Size

597.0 kB

After Optimization

228.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Interactivesecuritysolutions.com main page is 597.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 431.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 364.0 kB

  • Original 431.1 kB
  • After minification 427.0 kB
  • After compression 67.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 364.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 165.9 kB
  • After minification 161.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interactivesecuritysolutions images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (25%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interactivesecuritysolutions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

interactivesecuritysolutions.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

interactivesecuritysolutions.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

interactivesecuritysolutions.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interactivesecuritysolutions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interactivesecuritysolutions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interactivesecuritysolutions. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: