6.9 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.4 sec
963 ms
Visit interactiveselection.com now to see the best up-to-date Interactive Selection content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interactiveselection.com
Global Gaming Executive Search and Recruitment Diversity Specialist- Recruiting More Women and Minorities Building World Class Teams
Visit interactiveselection.comWe analyzed Interactiveselection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
interactiveselection.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.3 s
0/100
10%
Value39.2 s
0/100
25%
Value23.5 s
0/100
10%
Value25,120 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value45.5 s
0/100
10%
1572 ms
80 ms
203 ms
342 ms
238 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Interactiveselection.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Interactiveselection.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (23%)
9.1 MB
7.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Interactiveselection.com main page is 9.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Interactive Selection needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 483.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 483.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 437.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interactiveselection.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 437.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (61%)
59
23
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interactive Selection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interactiveselection.com
1572 ms
analytics.js
80 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
203 ms
layerslider.css
342 ms
styles.css
238 ms
feedzy-rss-feeds.css
235 ms
settings.css
373 ms
style.css
231 ms
base.css
431 ms
layout.css
673 ms
shortcodes.css
690 ms
animations.min.css
584 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
488 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
491 ms
responsive.css
577 ms
css
48 ms
greensock.js
845 ms
jquery.js
830 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
713 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
914 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
785 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
954 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
952 ms
collect
22 ms
scripts.js
887 ms
core.min.js
953 ms
widget.min.js
954 ms
mouse.min.js
1085 ms
sortable.min.js
1087 ms
tabs.min.js
1085 ms
accordion.min.js
1086 ms
plugins.js
1230 ms
menu.js
1086 ms
animations.min.js
1085 ms
jplayer.min.js
1122 ms
translate3d.js
1080 ms
scripts.js
1118 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1113 ms
api.js
54 ms
interactive-logo-full-35H.png
193 ms
logo165x35.png
228 ms
interactive-responsive-logo.png
262 ms
iStock-636514540_2000.png
1399 ms
stripes_3_b.png
281 ms
background.png
690 ms
523860874.png
1847 ms
David-Smith.png
828 ms
Interactive-LOGO.png
531 ms
irpLOGO.png
531 ms
tiga2013LOGO.png
689 ms
TIGA2017_973.jpg
687 ms
523860874.960w.png
1159 ms
iStock-523860874.960.png
843 ms
Interactive-LOGO-960x750.png
843 ms
WIG-LOGO-960x750.png
966 ms
Bame-LOGO-960x750.png
991 ms
interactive-logo-blk.png
949 ms
u037-e1497603076455.png
1078 ms
mfn-icons.woff
922 ms
box_shadow.png
985 ms
recaptcha__en.js
187 ms
interactiveselection.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
interactiveselection.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
interactiveselection.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interactiveselection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interactiveselection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interactiveselection.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interactive Selection. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: