4.1 sec in total
805 ms
2.9 sec
391 ms
Visit interactivesolutions.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Interactive Solutions content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interactivesolutions.co.uk
Custom, rapid e-learning content development, instructional design, animation, illustration and website design.
Visit interactivesolutions.co.ukWe analyzed Interactivesolutions.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 805 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
interactivesolutions.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value2,850 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
805 ms
537 ms
665 ms
293 ms
207 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Interactivesolutions.co.uk, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Interactivesolutions.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 362.2 kB (40%)
906.1 kB
543.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Interactivesolutions.co.uk main page is 906.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 423.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interactive Solutions images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 217.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 99.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interactivesolutions.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (55%)
92
41
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interactive Solutions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interactivesolutions.co.uk
805 ms
widgetkit-20bdc149.css
537 ms
mootools-core.js
665 ms
core.js
293 ms
caption.js
207 ms
jquery.js
689 ms
widgetkit-02b0f9b7.js
264 ms
base.css
309 ms
layout.css
357 ms
menus.css
391 ms
modules.css
507 ms
tools.css
449 ms
system.css
491 ms
extensions.css
544 ms
custom.css
593 ms
animations.css
609 ms
plain.css
626 ms
nobile.css
637 ms
droidsans.css
711 ms
droidsans.css
712 ms
style.css
720 ms
print.css
730 ms
css
26 ms
droidsans.css
758 ms
warp.js
775 ms
accordionmenu.js
795 ms
dropdownmenu.js
746 ms
template.js
745 ms
search.js
751 ms
lightbox.js
162 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
277 ms
spotlight.js
198 ms
base.css
220 ms
layout.css
213 ms
menus.css
216 ms
modules.css
258 ms
tools.css
295 ms
system.css
304 ms
system.css
305 ms
system-all.css
318 ms
print.css
337 ms
page.jpg
122 ms
main.svg
124 ms
cloud-bg.jpg
198 ms
logo.png
126 ms
menubar.png
125 ms
menu_dropdown_level1_bg.png
120 ms
menu_dropdown_level1_bg_active.png
192 ms
menu_dropdown_level1_active.png
196 ms
menu_dropdown_level1.png
206 ms
searchbox_magnifier.png
208 ms
SL2.jpg
208 ms
3m-logo.gif
286 ms
aids-alliance-logo.gif
292 ms
balfour-beatty-logo.gif
297 ms
Scottish_Power.gif
309 ms
biffa-logo.gif
311 ms
brake-logo.gif
311 ms
kcom-logo.gif
380 ms
ng-bailey-logo.gif
386 ms
NHS-logo.gif
398 ms
ombudsman-services-logo.gif
412 ms
ieaghg-logo.gif
413 ms
st-georges-logo.gif
414 ms
lincoln-logo-small.gif
472 ms
uoh-logo-2.gif
479 ms
wpc-logo.gif
497 ms
hitachi-sml.jpg
514 ms
brake-sml.jpg
515 ms
home-ngb2.jpg
608 ms
home-alliance.jpg
568 ms
home-bbcap.jpg
577 ms
home-tom.jpg
691 ms
clients-title.gif
400 ms
slider2.png
690 ms
icon_check.png
603 ms
button_more.png
657 ms
slider3.png
916 ms
DG8QsMl4cLhwKd7DbhnV6A.ttf
22 ms
W-bwIcGmtt6wHyJeSNFUX6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
23 ms
ga.js
59 ms
DroidSans-webfont.woff
699 ms
slideshow.js
610 ms
slideset.js
653 ms
slider1.png
1048 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
buttons.png
672 ms
nav.png
647 ms
mod_box.png
673 ms
bottom_t.png
723 ms
bottom_b.png
716 ms
bottom.png
728 ms
mod_line_bottom_header.png
753 ms
footer.png
733 ms
totop_scroller.png
733 ms
interactivesolutions.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
interactivesolutions.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
interactivesolutions.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interactivesolutions.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interactivesolutions.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interactivesolutions.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interactive Solutions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: