11.2 sec in total
2 sec
7.4 sec
1.8 sec
Welcome to interaft.com homepage info - get ready to check Interaft best content right away, or after learning these important things about interaft.com
No-code development platforms are revolutionizing website and software design by making coding unnecessary. Designers, developers and entrepreneurs are leveraging this development trend.
Visit interaft.comWe analyzed Interaft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
interaft.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value27,160 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value34.4 s
0/100
10%
2027 ms
383 ms
450 ms
446 ms
489 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Interaft.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Interaft.com.
Page size can be reduced by 394.4 kB (74%)
531.9 kB
137.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Interaft.com main page is 531.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 259.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 176.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 176.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interaft.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 160.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (58%)
74
31
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interaft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.interaft.com
2027 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
383 ms
style.css
450 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
446 ms
style.css
489 ms
themes.style.css
489 ms
themesTabs.style.css
489 ms
font-awesome.min.css
615 ms
styles.css
680 ms
bwg_frontend.css
668 ms
font-awesome.css
681 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
701 ms
sumoselect.css
701 ms
checkbox.min.css
848 ms
css
62 ms
ionicons.min.css
25 ms
css
70 ms
bxslider.css
852 ms
wpp.css
865 ms
frontend.css
868 ms
form-theme-light.min.css
884 ms
style.css
886 ms
style-front.css
1042 ms
addtoany.min.css
1074 ms
jquery.js
1317 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1095 ms
addtoany.min.js
1115 ms
bwg_frontend.js
1113 ms
jquery.sumoselect.min.js
1275 ms
jquery.mobile.js
1297 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
1379 ms
jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.js
1379 ms
bwg_gallery_box.js
1393 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1505 ms
global.js
1519 ms
responsive-menu.js
1543 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1557 ms
page.js
105 ms
core.min.js
1694 ms
widget.min.js
1694 ms
accordion.min.js
1642 ms
tabs.min.js
1429 ms
scripts.js
1383 ms
frontend.js
1384 ms
validate.js
1383 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1384 ms
www.interaft.com
1099 ms
page2shadow.png
413 ms
cropped-logo.png
642 ms
banner-img.png
1146 ms
app-store-logo.png
907 ms
android.png
459 ms
course-form.png
864 ms
trainer.png
1178 ms
trainee.png
892 ms
desktop.png
1513 ms
important1.png
1098 ms
countdown1.png
1178 ms
reminder1.png
1338 ms
note1.png
1338 ms
video1.png
1339 ms
audio1.png
1360 ms
file1.png
1420 ms
change1.png
1555 ms
tips1.png
1572 ms
todo1.png
1583 ms
exercise1.png
1599 ms
event1.png
1652 ms
advertisement1.png
1732 ms
map1.png
1781 ms
question1.png
1804 ms
weblink1.png
1856 ms
responsive-layout.png
2074 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
65 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
124 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
256 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
256 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
256 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2009 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1861 ms
ui-icons_555555_256x240.png
1714 ms
border-image-new.png
1714 ms
interaft.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
interaft.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
interaft.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interaft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interaft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interaft.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interaft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: