26.4 sec in total
466 ms
7.5 sec
18.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Interbrand content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interbrand.com
For 50 years, Interbrand is creating iconic work in Brand Strategy, Experience Design, and Brand Valuation for the leading global brands.
Visit interbrand.comWe analyzed Interbrand.com page load time and found that the first response time was 466 ms and then it took 25.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
interbrand.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value5.5 s
70/100
10%
466 ms
81 ms
1105 ms
2511 ms
2501 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Interbrand.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Msgapp.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) relates to the external source Msgapp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 872.3 kB (20%)
4.4 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Interbrand.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.3 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interbrand images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 473.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 473.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 233.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interbrand.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (29%)
24
17
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interbrand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
interbrand.com
466 ms
reset.css
81 ms
main.css
1105 ms
jquery.js
2511 ms
isotope.pkgd.js
2501 ms
main.js
2243 ms
detectmobile.js
2469 ms
frs-app.js
3674 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
3128 ms
gtm.js
2325 ms
interbrand-logo.png
1785 ms
search-icon.png
1734 ms
best-asia-brands-2017-hero.jpg
2095 ms
Jez-Rise-header.jpg
2135 ms
Naming-subheader.jpg
2134 ms
Brandchannel-5-questions.jpg
2133 ms
GAP-07.jpg
2132 ms
Munich_Hero.jpg
2196 ms
Juventus-Hero-1.jpg
2197 ms
Bounty-header.jpg
2421 ms
Green-Mountain-Coffee-Header.jpg
2442 ms
Piaggio-Motoplex_InterbrandMilan.jpg
2197 ms
interbrand-views-video.png
2420 ms
social-icons-white.png
2441 ms
HelveticaNeueforIBW01-Bold.woff
369 ms
web.gif
1209 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
1207 ms
interbrand.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
interbrand.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
interbrand.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interbrand.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interbrand.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interbrand.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interbrand. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: