Tools & Wizards About Us
intercare.org.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

intercare.org.uk

Inter Care | Providing Medical Aid for Africa | Based in the UK

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

297 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

276 ms

intercare.org.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intercare.org.uk homepage info - get ready to check Inter Care best content right away, or after learning these important things about intercare.org.uk

Providing medical aid for vulnerable patients in sub-Saharan Africa through the provision of surplus medical aid.

Visit intercare.org.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Intercare.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 297 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intercare.org.uk performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.224

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intercare.org.uk

297 ms

intercare.org.uk

1825 ms

js

57 ms

tribe-events-pro-mini-calendar-block.min.css

107 ms

style.min.css

215 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Intercare.org.uk, 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Intercare.org.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 233.4 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intercare.org.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 90.7 kB

  • Original 116.1 kB
  • After minification 110.8 kB
  • After compression 25.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inter Care images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 111.6 kB

  • Original 552.9 kB
  • After minification 552.5 kB
  • After compression 441.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.6 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 25.1 kB

  • Original 106.6 kB
  • After minification 101.7 kB
  • After compression 81.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intercare.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.1 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (79%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inter Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intercare.org.uk

intercare.org.uk

297 ms

intercare.org.uk

intercare.org.uk

1825 ms

js

js

57 ms

tribe-events-pro-mini-calendar-block.min.css

tribe-events-pro-mini-calendar-block.min.css

107 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

215 ms

styles.css

styles.css

255 ms

video-container.min.css

video-container.min.css

262 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

290 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

391 ms

style.css

style.css

317 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

340 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

350 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

431 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

386 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

411 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

41 ms

css

css

43 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

443 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

692 ms

jquery-1.10.2.js

jquery-1.10.2.js

35 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

488 ms

js

js

70 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

771 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

509 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

770 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

763 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

586 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

607 ms

widgets-events-common-skeleton.min.css

widgets-events-common-skeleton.min.css

684 ms

widgets-events-common-full.min.css

widgets-events-common-full.min.css

768 ms

variables-skeleton.min.css

variables-skeleton.min.css

801 ms

common-skeleton.min.css

common-skeleton.min.css

1006 ms

widget-events-list-skeleton.min.css

widget-events-list-skeleton.min.css

1005 ms

variables-full.min.css

variables-full.min.css

856 ms

common-full.min.css

common-full.min.css

1020 ms

widget-events-list-full.min.css

widget-events-list-full.min.css

1014 ms

hustle-icons.min.css

hustle-icons.min.css

881 ms

hustle-global.min.css

hustle-global.min.css

965 ms

hustle-optin.min.css

hustle-optin.min.css

984 ms

hustle-inline.min.css

hustle-inline.min.css

1058 ms

css

css

60 ms

widget-events-list-skeleton.min.css

widget-events-list-skeleton.min.css

1090 ms

api.js

api.js

73 ms

widget-events-list-full.min.css

widget-events-list-full.min.css

1092 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1010 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

899 ms

index.js

index.js

876 ms

index.js

index.js

902 ms

hustle-ui.min.js

hustle-ui.min.js

1058 ms

underscore-before.js

underscore-before.js

912 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

903 ms

underscore-after.js

underscore-after.js

882 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

978 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

867 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

900 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

903 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

868 ms

functions.js

functions.js

899 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

924 ms

index.js

index.js

905 ms

tribe-common.min.js

tribe-common.min.js

827 ms

query-string.min.js

query-string.min.js

817 ms

manager.min.js

manager.min.js

745 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

91 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

79 ms

breakpoints.min.js

breakpoints.min.js

678 ms

Inter_Care_Logo_RGB.svg

Inter_Care_Logo_RGB.svg

753 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

35 ms

GillSansStd.otf

GillSansStd.otf

750 ms

GillSansStd-Light.otf

GillSansStd-Light.otf

776 ms

intercare-fb-logo.png

intercare-fb-logo.png

776 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

intercare-tw-logo.png

intercare-tw-logo.png

758 ms

GillSansStd-Bold.otf

GillSansStd-Bold.otf

687 ms

intercare-ig-logo.png

intercare-ig-logo.png

703 ms

website-update-March-2020-2-1.png

website-update-March-2020-2-1.png

950 ms

InterCare-Video-Thumbnail.png

InterCare-Video-Thumbnail.png

1245 ms

InterCare-Video-Thumbnail-150x150.png

InterCare-Video-Thumbnail-150x150.png

647 ms

53830139781_75d3b9ceea_o-150x150.jpg

53830139781_75d3b9ceea_o-150x150.jpg

632 ms

IMG-20240426-WA0001-150x150.jpg

IMG-20240426-WA0001-150x150.jpg

637 ms

Joseph-and-grandmother-1-e1718707721578-150x150.png

Joseph-and-grandmother-1-e1718707721578-150x150.png

743 ms

Dereck-2-scaled-e1715587855689-150x150.jpg

Dereck-2-scaled-e1715587855689-150x150.jpg

677 ms

1.png

1.png

1436 ms

2.png

2.png

745 ms

3.png

3.png

827 ms

4.png

4.png

1290 ms

award.png

award.png

848 ms

fr-logo-1.jpg

fr-logo-1.jpg

1092 ms

search-icon.png

search-icon.png

861 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

29 ms

collect

collect

73 ms

dot.png

dot.png

575 ms

prev-btn.png

prev-btn.png

650 ms

next-btn.png

next-btn.png

686 ms

dot-hover.png

dot-hover.png

596 ms

Accessibility Review

intercare.org.uk accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

intercare.org.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

intercare.org.uk SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intercare.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intercare.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intercare.org.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inter Care. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: