Tools & Wizards About Us
interco.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

interco.com

Expert Business Management - Interco Management Consultants

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

677 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

479 ms

interco.com screenshot

About Website

Visit interco.com now to see the best up-to-date Interco content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interco.com

Interco Management Limited (Interco) provides experienced consultancy advice and active management assistance for the owners of small firms and for directors of larger companies

Visit interco.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 677 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interco.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.interco.com

677 ms

styles.min.css

163 ms

css

29 ms

css

20 ms

et-core-unified-14088.min.css

163 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Interco.com, 53% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Interco.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 208.3 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

799.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Interco.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 696.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 151.5 kB

  • Original 180.4 kB
  • After minification 175.6 kB
  • After compression 28.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 39.1 kB

  • Original 696.8 kB
  • After minification 657.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interco images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 126.3 kB
  • After minification 126.3 kB
  • After compression 109.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 859 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interco.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 859 B or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (33%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.interco.com

www.interco.com

677 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

163 ms

css

css

29 ms

css

css

20 ms

et-core-unified-14088.min.css

et-core-unified-14088.min.css

163 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

380 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

247 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

568 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

327 ms

common.js

common.js

328 ms

Interco-Logo-Tel-V3.png

Interco-Logo-Tel-V3.png

322 ms

Interco-People-Talking.jpg

Interco-People-Talking.jpg

407 ms

Interco-Consultants-Talking.jpg

Interco-Consultants-Talking.jpg

543 ms

BS-MO-V1.jpg

BS-MO-V1.jpg

571 ms

speachmarksmall.png

speachmarksmall.png

379 ms

40pxspacer.png

40pxspacer.png

405 ms

Smart-Business-Support-V4.png

Smart-Business-Support-V4.png

463 ms

Interco-IS-Logo.png

Interco-IS-Logo.png

542 ms

fsbr3-mobile.png

fsbr3-mobile.png

816 ms

r3logo5.png

r3logo5.png

714 ms

fsblogob.png

fsblogob.png

648 ms

1340pxgrey-background.jpg

1340pxgrey-background.jpg

379 ms

Masthead-V1-.jpg

Masthead-V1-.jpg

737 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCM.woff

25 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCM.woff

36 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CM.woff

45 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCM.woff

46 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCM.woff

50 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCM.woff

50 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCM.woff

46 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCM.woff

44 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCM.woff

50 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

51 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

51 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

81 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

80 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

81 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

592 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3TtA.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3TtA.woff

80 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6ew.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6ew.woff

82 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtA.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtA.woff

82 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvTtA.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvTtA.woff

83 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVQ.woff

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVQ.woff

83 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVQ.woff

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVQ.woff

83 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVQ.woff

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVQ.woff

83 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVQ.woff

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVQ.woff

84 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVQ.woff

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVQ.woff

83 ms

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejYHtGyL.woff

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejYHtGyL.woff

86 ms

4iCu6KVjbNBYlgoKeg7w.woff

4iCu6KVjbNBYlgoKeg7w.woff

85 ms

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZftWyL.woff

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZftWyL.woff

86 ms

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZPsmyL.woff

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZPsmyL.woff

85 ms

Accessibility Review

interco.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

interco.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

interco.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

interco.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interco. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: