Tools & Wizards About Us
intercodam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

intercodam.com

Premium Tegels, Sanitair en Keukens - Intercodam Amsterdam

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

291 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

247 ms

intercodam.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Intercodam content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intercodam.com

Opzoek naar de perfecte synergie tussen tegels en sanitair? ✓100+ jaar ervaring ✓Ervaren adviseurs ✓Exclusief aanbod

Visit intercodam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intercodam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intercodam.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,270 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.494

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intercodam.com

291 ms

intercodam.com

375 ms

www.intercodam.com

498 ms

loader.css

21 ms

loader-theme.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Intercodam.com, 45% (21 requests) were made to D2ftqzf4nsbvwq.cloudfront.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (597 ms) belongs to the original domain Intercodam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 194.2 kB (40%)

Content Size

491.3 kB

After Optimization

297.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intercodam.com main page is 491.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 279.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 85.3 kB

  • Original 97.0 kB
  • After minification 70.5 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.5 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 566 B
  • After minification 566 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intercodam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 108.7 kB

  • Original 279.5 kB
  • After minification 279.5 kB
  • After compression 170.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 108.7 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 154 B

  • Original 114.1 kB
  • After minification 114.1 kB
  • After compression 114.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intercodam.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (85%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intercodam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intercodam.com

intercodam.com

291 ms

intercodam.com

intercodam.com

375 ms

www.intercodam.com

www.intercodam.com

498 ms

loader.css

loader.css

21 ms

loader-theme.css

loader-theme.css

27 ms

icons.css

icons.css

29 ms

js

js

111 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

24 ms

essentials.css

essentials.css

64 ms

style.css

style.css

47 ms

max-wide.css

max-wide.css

64 ms

max-desktop.css

max-desktop.css

66 ms

max-tablet-landscape.css

max-tablet-landscape.css

69 ms

max-tablet-portrait.css

max-tablet-portrait.css

66 ms

max-mobile.css

max-mobile.css

74 ms

hover.css

hover.css

79 ms

theme.css

theme.css

71 ms

essentials.js

essentials.js

109 ms

es-equal.js

es-equal.js

283 ms

es-jumper.js

es-jumper.js

375 ms

es-loader.js

es-loader.js

405 ms

es-maps.js

es-maps.js

402 ms

es-popup.js

es-popup.js

404 ms

es-slider.js

es-slider.js

402 ms

es-sticky.js

es-sticky.js

404 ms

es-video.js

es-video.js

563 ms

es-animation.js

es-animation.js

497 ms

es-lazyload.js

es-lazyload.js

497 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

597 ms

custom-main.js

custom-main.js

503 ms

custom-essentials.js

custom-essentials.js

502 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

147 ms

icon.png

icon.png

63 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

20 ms

js

js

143 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

52 ms

collect

collect

88 ms

core.js

core.js

130 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

99 ms

futura-500.woff

futura-500.woff

57 ms

futura-400.woff

futura-400.woff

496 ms

futura-300.woff

futura-300.woff

376 ms

futura-700.woff

futura-700.woff

470 ms

waas.woff

waas.woff

57 ms

collect

collect

85 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

100 ms

Accessibility Review

intercodam.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

intercodam.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

intercodam.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intercodam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intercodam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intercodam.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: