Tools & Wizards About Us
interepinc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

interepinc.com

Heavy Industrial Plant Maintenance Service & Parts | INTEREP

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

806 ms

interepinc.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing INTEREP Inc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interepinc.com

Ductwork Analysis Engineered Solutions Peace of Mind Heavy Industrial Plant Maintenance Services and Parts Keeping your heavy industrial plant online is challenging. With all the piping and ducting sy...

Visit interepinc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interepinc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interepinc.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interepinc.com

66 ms

interepinc.com

788 ms

js

71 ms

style.min.css

57 ms

style.css

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Interepinc.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (788 ms) belongs to the original domain Interepinc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Interepinc.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 80.1 kB

  • Original 99.6 kB
  • After minification 97.8 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INTEREP Inc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 899 B

  • Original 244.1 kB
  • After minification 244.1 kB
  • After compression 243.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 201.2 kB
  • After minification 201.2 kB
  • After compression 199.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interepinc.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (50%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INTEREP Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

interepinc.com

interepinc.com

66 ms

interepinc.com

interepinc.com

788 ms

js

js

71 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

57 ms

style.css

style.css

99 ms

mailin-front.css

mailin-front.css

99 ms

24aa488594a23517d107a0e3c5e6a762.min.css

24aa488594a23517d107a0e3c5e6a762.min.css

222 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

99 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

99 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

142 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

139 ms

w.js

w.js

19 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

150 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

140 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

141 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

146 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

150 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

152 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

158 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

168 ms

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

178 ms

mailin-front.js

mailin-front.js

179 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

160 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

165 ms

swap.js

swap.js

36 ms

3bba0c77896f3c81e9a38d27cd546b39.min.js

3bba0c77896f3c81e9a38d27cd546b39.min.js

317 ms

g.gif

g.gif

62 ms

interep_logo_300.png

interep_logo_300.png

63 ms

unnamed.png

unnamed.png

598 ms

unnamed-1.png

unnamed-1.png

257 ms

unnamed-2.png

unnamed-2.png

121 ms

unnamed-3.png

unnamed-3.png

87 ms

unnamed-4.png

unnamed-4.png

165 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

92 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

116 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

121 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

145 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

149 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

151 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

174 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

177 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

180 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

194 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

202 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

209 ms

interep_retina.png

interep_retina.png

209 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

205 ms

Accessibility Review

interepinc.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

interepinc.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

interepinc.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interepinc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Interepinc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

interepinc.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INTEREP Inc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: