Tools & Wizards About Us
interface-design.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

interface-design.co.uk

Award winning UX Design Agency | Excellence in Product Design

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

806 ms

interface-design.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to interface-design.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Interface Design best content for Romania right away, or after learning these important things about interface-design.co.uk

Digital product agency: user experience for web, mobile and industrial apps, research and user interface design. Clients: Ford, Discovery Channel, Philips, Vodafone, OECD. Globally acclaimed, based in...

Visit interface-design.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Interface-design.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interface-design.co.uk performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interface-design.co.uk

179 ms

interface-design.co.uk

344 ms

js

85 ms

css2

34 ms

logo-creative-navy-design-agency.svg

243 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Interface-design.co.uk, 39% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (608 ms) relates to the external source Cdnjs.cloudflare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 270.3 kB (64%)

Content Size

420.7 kB

After Optimization

150.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Interface-design.co.uk main page is 420.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 287.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 225.2 kB

  • Original 287.3 kB
  • After minification 287.2 kB
  • After compression 62.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 225.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 45.0 kB

  • Original 124.0 kB
  • After minification 78.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Interface Design needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 36% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 70 B

  • Original 9.4 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (40%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interface Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

interface-design.co.uk

interface-design.co.uk

179 ms

interface-design.co.uk

interface-design.co.uk

344 ms

js

js

85 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

logo-creative-navy-design-agency.svg

logo-creative-navy-design-agency.svg

243 ms

logo-creative-navy-design-agency-mobile.svg

logo-creative-navy-design-agency-mobile.svg

243 ms

visual-design-excellence-illustration.inline.svg

visual-design-excellence-illustration.inline.svg

234 ms

arrow-sheet.png

arrow-sheet.png

204 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

64 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff

77 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

89 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

608 ms

webpack-runtime-54483c8fab8b913a56dd.js

webpack-runtime-54483c8fab8b913a56dd.js

46 ms

polyfill-cf7b2eb9118fd9529750.js

polyfill-cf7b2eb9118fd9529750.js

521 ms

framework-782dca87aa97aac712fc.js

framework-782dca87aa97aac712fc.js

359 ms

app-2cccefc2ef21e5e6bc64.js

app-2cccefc2ef21e5e6bc64.js

172 ms

girl-with-sunglasses-stars.png

girl-with-sunglasses-stars.png

270 ms

sunglasses.png

sunglasses.png

271 ms

quotes.svg

quotes.svg

270 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZs.woff

9 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZs.woff

20 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZs.woff

22 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZs.woff

24 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff

23 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff

23 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZs.woff

20 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZs.woff

21 ms

Accessibility Review

interface-design.co.uk accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

interface-design.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

interface-design.co.uk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interface-design.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interface-design.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

interface-design.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interface Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: