2.1 sec in total
282 ms
1.5 sec
292 ms
Visit interfacepeople.com now to see the best up-to-date Interfacepeople content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interfacepeople.com
IPeople Healthcare MEDITECH Solutions #1 Downtime and Archiving
Visit interfacepeople.comWe analyzed Interfacepeople.com page load time and found that the first response time was 282 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Interfacepeople.com rating and web reputation
interfacepeople.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value29.6 s
0/100
25%
Value17.1 s
0/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.283
43/100
15%
Value55.6 s
0/100
10%
282 ms
132 ms
95 ms
99 ms
122 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Interfacepeople.com, 15% (6 requests) were made to Ipeople.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Ddefc.rsvpgenius.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (404 ms) relates to the external source Ddefc.rsvpgenius.com.
Page size can be reduced by 821.7 kB (54%)
1.5 MB
709.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Interfacepeople.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 733.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interfacepeople images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 501.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 501.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 252.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interfacepeople.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 252.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (49%)
35
18
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interfacepeople. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interfacepeople.com
282 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
132 ms
coda-slider.css
95 ms
image_banner.css
99 ms
StyleSheet.css
122 ms
WebResource.axd
121 ms
WebResource.axd
98 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
351 ms
conversion.js
16 ms
banner-logo.png
114 ms
banner-Twitter.png
82 ms
banner-GooglePlus.png
83 ms
banner-Facebook.png
85 ms
banner-LinkedIn.png
84 ms
MenuBkgrd.png
39 ms
banner-blog.png
52 ms
reqinfodemo.png
60 ms
ipeople-all-in-one-data-solutions.png
240 ms
@interfacepeople96A6C01035B70538332F1824.png
115 ms
circle-ipeoplegizmo-accountanalysiswizard.png
90 ms
2015_11_06_bigbanners_datamigration_alt_1EB6F29F1C0FE.png
306 ms
widgets.js
89 ms
48 ms
swE4vjwMoSg
101 ms
41 ms
mgTrack1.js
404 ms
56 ms
57 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
28 ms
www-embed-player.js
49 ms
base.js
65 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
8 ms
ad_status.js
42 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
42 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
46 ms
mgTrack2.js
169 ms
mgTrack3.js
168 ms
ga.js
24 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
128 ms
syndication
119 ms
308677968396435457
218 ms
interfacepeople.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
interfacepeople.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
interfacepeople.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interfacepeople.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Interfacepeople.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interfacepeople.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interfacepeople. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: