2.6 sec in total
175 ms
2.2 sec
200 ms
Click here to check amazing Interfacio content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interfacio.com
Interfacio provides global audio recruitment services for specialist roles within the music, broadcast, post-production and events industries.
Visit interfacio.comWe analyzed Interfacio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
interfacio.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value1,480 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.085
93/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
175 ms
661 ms
29 ms
249 ms
251 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Interfacio.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (664 ms) belongs to the original domain Interfacio.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (65%)
1.7 MB
602.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Interfacio.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interfacio images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 55.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interfacio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 83 (97%)
86
3
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interfacio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 71 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interfacio.com
175 ms
interfacio.com
661 ms
script.js
29 ms
extendify-utilities.css
249 ms
font-awesome.min.css
251 ms
styles.css
251 ms
frontend.min.css
330 ms
flatpickr.min.css
253 ms
select2.min.css
320 ms
comment-form.min.css
333 ms
privacy.min.css
334 ms
faqs.min.css
333 ms
portfolio.min.css
335 ms
style.min.css
401 ms
jquery.min.js
494 ms
fuse_script.js
411 ms
rbtools.min.js
660 ms
rs6.min.js
664 ms
flatpickr.min.js
511 ms
select2.min.js
482 ms
log
399 ms
js
57 ms
css
37 ms
style.min.css
421 ms
rs6.css
419 ms
lazysizes.min.js
421 ms
hooks.min.js
421 ms
i18n.min.js
425 ms
index.js
426 ms
index.js
426 ms
frontend.min.js
427 ms
api.js
41 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
473 ms
index.js
493 ms
fusion-vertical-menu-widget.js
493 ms
cssua.js
494 ms
modernizr.js
526 ms
fusion.js
525 ms
isotope.js
526 ms
packery.js
617 ms
bootstrap.transition.js
618 ms
bootstrap.tooltip.js
617 ms
jquery.requestAnimationFrame.js
617 ms
jquery.easing.js
612 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
611 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
636 ms
jquery.ilightbox.js
642 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.js
577 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
569 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
572 ms
jquery.fade.js
578 ms
imagesLoaded.js
636 ms
fusion-parallax.js
640 ms
fusion-video-general.js
567 ms
fusion-video-bg.js
570 ms
fusion-lightbox.js
502 ms
fusion-tooltip.js
483 ms
fusion-sharing-box.js
392 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.js
398 ms
fusion-youtube.js
399 ms
vimeoPlayer.js
402 ms
avada-general-footer.js
407 ms
avada-quantity.js
414 ms
avada-crossfade-images.js
467 ms
avada-select.js
470 ms
avada-tabs-widget.js
471 ms
avada-rev-styles.js
477 ms
avada-contact-form-7.js
483 ms
avada-live-search.js
444 ms
fusion-alert.js
479 ms
awb-off-canvas.js
481 ms
fusion-animations.js
451 ms
fusion-flexslider.js
458 ms
fusion-button.js
463 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
22 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
87 ms
fusion-blog.js
469 ms
fusion-testimonials.js
434 ms
fusion-container.js
437 ms
avada-drop-down.js
438 ms
avada-to-top.js
444 ms
avada-header.js
452 ms
avada-menu.js
448 ms
bootstrap.scrollspy.js
483 ms
avada-scrollspy.js
483 ms
fusion-responsive-typography.js
479 ms
fusion-scroll-to-anchor.js
484 ms
fusion-general-global.js
490 ms
fusion-video.js
493 ms
fusion-column.js
484 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
494 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
492 ms
awb-icons.woff
489 ms
dummy.png
535 ms
interfacio.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
interfacio.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
interfacio.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interfacio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interfacio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interfacio.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interfacio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: