1.8 sec in total
182 ms
1.3 sec
322 ms
Click here to check amazing InterFAX content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interfax.net
Securely transmit documents around the world while adhering to global data security standards with our online cloud fax service.
Visit interfax.netWe analyzed Interfax.net page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
interfax.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value3,160 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value22.9 s
1/100
10%
182 ms
40 ms
28 ms
52 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Interfax.net, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (346 ms) belongs to the original domain Interfax.net.
Page size can be reduced by 784.9 kB (58%)
1.4 MB
579.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Interfax.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 455.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, InterFAX needs image optimization as it can save up to 102.1 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 302.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 302.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 343.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interfax.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 343.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (30%)
66
46
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of InterFAX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interfax.net
182 ms
en
40 ms
css_lQaZfjVpwP_oGNqdtWCSpJT1EMqXdMiU84ekLLxQnc4.css
28 ms
css_hTLrwzbU9bZhjvzx-j5entbJFEHkjJyd6RgHEla8FhA.css
52 ms
css_lc73rwriXzmOrJKETUcvDEJx1UC0FKf3NgQx_6sEqLs.css
76 ms
css_ltuiZsEXf_v_fqIE4qD3lfTcBw5dwsNf7Io4gXc_mMA.css
80 ms
css_D7FFBcAVjSLwrqnzQJqJYwBecPT7GIRjaGC2MN3PwEQ.css
130 ms
css_nQwtytNsztHNRD8oGYQyyja_LgjxLi44qLISIPyImuw.css
82 ms
js_MpKfe1sTh5JIVGCZ17DsAuT1rqAC38MLLlkjqjQ1X_k.js
139 ms
js_oZD9-WvfiElJ5KPavqu9ZAQiZcfWlzNCzxFHpedR9dI.js
83 ms
js_RaJfFgFn_J0unRLEK9lfFC0wdAQRkXxvKUdzpY05-AI.js
99 ms
js_eRG1Ci_11Qka1KV7Db9VTjX2vwRJdUlgNOuGEEJ6_6w.js
125 ms
js_o0DNYiVi8ZwwIibSK29Qh8ZNjaG_LzF0R7Ixo0_OsUA.js
139 ms
current.js
44 ms
28778.js
50 ms
js_8jesztKLu9rCDCmAh4TUgGDO0PLl9BKmil9c2nLMnOc.js
143 ms
css
52 ms
css
64 ms
iflogo_en_150.png
76 ms
ef61e2d3-c22a-4625-a9fc-6e2e4f1b448d.png
222 ms
hp-bridge3-prog2.jpg
261 ms
cloud_2.png
77 ms
desktop_1.png
71 ms
fax_api_0.png
72 ms
fax_secure.png
70 ms
uploads%2520logo-120x119_2.png
84 ms
intel_0.png
84 ms
vodafone_0.png
82 ms
citibank_0.png
83 ms
subway_0.png
220 ms
logo-facile_0_0.png
221 ms
sanbenedetto_0.jpg
219 ms
olympus_0.png
219 ms
united_0.png
220 ms
iata_0.png
258 ms
revlon_0.png
256 ms
interflora_0.png
261 ms
siemens_0.png
257 ms
legal_general.png
256 ms
sheraton_0.png
311 ms
hp_0.png
314 ms
amazon_0.png
311 ms
philips_0.png
310 ms
mitsubishi_0.png
311 ms
orange_0.png
312 ms
sydney_0.png
316 ms
agfa.png
316 ms
bentley.png
339 ms
sony_bmg_0.png
339 ms
microsoft_0.png
339 ms
nokia_0.png
342 ms
smart_0.png
345 ms
ripe_0.png
343 ms
vodafone_rental_0.png
345 ms
virgin_0.png
346 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
226 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
242 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
287 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
287 ms
atrk.js
176 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
299 ms
dhl_0.png
285 ms
proloco_0.png
294 ms
hotel_pci_compliant_whitepaper_cta.png
345 ms
gtm.js
211 ms
1706648.js
241 ms
world.png
291 ms
51629865-cece-4e32-a021-996a47ebdc8a.js
154 ms
analytics.js
205 ms
atrk.gif
64 ms
collect
37 ms
collect
54 ms
ga-audiences
41 ms
nr-852.min.js
95 ms
loader-v2.js
55 ms
__ptq.gif
39 ms
interfax.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
interfax.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
interfax.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interfax.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interfax.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interfax.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of InterFAX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: