3.2 sec in total
203 ms
2.6 sec
348 ms
Click here to check amazing Interfix Group content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interfixgroup.com
Complete refurbishment solutions from bespoke design through to professional installation for commercial, retail and school toilets and washrooms
Visit interfixgroup.comWe analyzed Interfixgroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 203 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
interfixgroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value26.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value2,290 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value24.0 s
1/100
10%
203 ms
439 ms
118 ms
32 ms
210 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Interfixgroup.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Data.whizeo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 147.7 kB (9%)
1.6 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Interfixgroup.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 850.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interfix Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interfixgroup.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (89%)
71
8
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interfix Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interfixgroup.com
203 ms
interfixgroup.com
439 ms
style.min.css
118 ms
css
32 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
210 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
262 ms
js_composer.min.css
423 ms
ave-core.min.css
251 ms
liquid-icon.min.css
255 ms
font-awesome.min.css
259 ms
bootstrap.min.css
293 ms
jquery-ui.css
335 ms
flickity.min.css
337 ms
fresco.css
340 ms
lity.min.css
343 ms
style.css
376 ms
theme.min.css
593 ms
sweetalert2.min.css
436 ms
OverlayScrollbars.min.css
437 ms
stylesFull.css
438 ms
scale-extreme.css
458 ms
light.css
504 ms
liquid-responsive-100.css
517 ms
jquery.min.js
615 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
515 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
541 ms
script.min.js
614 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
684 ms
sweetalert2.all.min.js
626 ms
jquery.overlayScrollbars.min.js
670 ms
popper.min.js
673 ms
tippy-bundle.umd.min.js
684 ms
EasePack.min.js
701 ms
gsap.min.js
709 ms
app.js
1048 ms
785229.js
56 ms
v4-shims.min.css
1046 ms
all.min.css
1046 ms
animate.min.css
1046 ms
fresco.js
935 ms
lity.min.js
845 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
861 ms
SplitText.min.js
852 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
853 ms
StackBlur.js
850 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
815 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
777 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
868 ms
flickity-fade.min.js
862 ms
vivus.min.js
862 ms
bootstrap.min.js
833 ms
intersection-observer.js
773 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
766 ms
css2
18 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
846 ms
anime.min.js
844 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
826 ms
fontfaceobserver.js
778 ms
lazyload.min.js
768 ms
tinycolor-min.js
763 ms
theme.min.js
807 ms
loader.js
1283 ms
gtm.js
390 ms
lftracker_v1_3P1w24dWWrg7mY5n.js
745 ms
Screenshot-2020-09-25-at-12.23.09.png
614 ms
css-vars-ponyfill.min.js
953 ms
192446049
628 ms
59ccbcb3e1855-tuc22.09.17248of399-scaled.jpg
152 ms
5afe99dcb419a-stnicholas30.04.18294of382.jpg
252 ms
543bccf2e0ea2-maxwoodmaxcamb-002551-1-scaled.jpg
252 ms
59ccbcb3e1855-tuc22.09.17248of399-scaled.jpg
494 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
128 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
128 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
128 ms
liquid-icon.woff
489 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
321 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
321 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
343 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
344 ms
543bccf2e0ea2-maxwoodmaxcamb-002551-1-scaled.jpg
571 ms
5afe99dcb419a-stnicholas30.04.18294of382.jpg
571 ms
gtm.js
50 ms
insight.min.js
50 ms
stat.js
39 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
118 ms
api.js
31 ms
tr-rc.lfeeder.com
60 ms
interfixgroup.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
interfixgroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
interfixgroup.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interfixgroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interfixgroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interfixgroup.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interfix Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: