609 ms in total
48 ms
508 ms
53 ms
Visit interfuze.com now to see the best up-to-date INTERFUZE content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interfuze.com
We deliver best value solutions in the areas of Engineering Services, Environmental and Infrastructure Management, Logistics & Operations, Enterprise IT Services, and Training.
Visit interfuze.comWe analyzed Interfuze.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 561 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
interfuze.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
48 ms
33 ms
30 ms
26 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Interfuze.com, 33% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 33% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (278 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 470.3 kB (55%)
860.9 kB
390.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Interfuze.com main page is 860.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 546.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 420.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 420.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, INTERFUZE needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (53%)
19
9
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INTERFUZE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.interfuze.com
48 ms
minified.js
33 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
30 ms
polyfill.min.js
26 ms
thunderbolt-commons.5f3ef9f8.bundle.min.js
106 ms
main.055801ac.bundle.min.js
109 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
23 ms
lodash.min.js
106 ms
react.production.min.js
105 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
108 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
108 ms
INTERFUZE_notag.png
278 ms
bundle.min.js
53 ms
d3d0f1_a5442adf53fd4db08a97b106959eef6a~mv2.jpg
252 ms
71a20b_b5fc8d63d7c343d08b0da2d896261246~mv2_d_10592_3116_s_4_2.jpg
234 ms
INTERFUZE_WhiteText_NoTag.png
261 ms
132 ms
127 ms
127 ms
125 ms
124 ms
121 ms
137 ms
135 ms
133 ms
135 ms
131 ms
150 ms
file.woff
6 ms
file.woff
15 ms
file.woff
15 ms
file.woff
32 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
23 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
interfuze.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
interfuze.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
interfuze.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interfuze.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interfuze.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interfuze.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INTERFUZE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: