Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

intermarkrelocation.ru

Intermark Россия | Релокация, иммиграция, помощь

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

528 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

464 ms

intermarkrelocation.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intermarkrelocation.ru homepage info - get ready to check Intermark Relocation best content right away, or after learning these important things about intermarkrelocation.ru

Релокация людей и бизнеса, иммиграция, юридическое сопровождение, помощь в ВНЖ и ПМЖ, перевозка вещей и переезды, поиск жилья

Visit intermarkrelocation.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Intermarkrelocation.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 528 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intermarkrelocation.ru performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intermarkrelocation.ru

528 ms

intermarkrelocation.ru

794 ms

tag.js

838 ms

pz.css

155 ms

intranet-common.css

311 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Intermarkrelocation.ru, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.bitrix24.ru and 8% (7 requests) were made to Crm.intermarkrelocation.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Intermarkrelocation.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 305.2 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

836.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Intermarkrelocation.ru main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 828.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 74.8 kB

  • Original 91.2 kB
  • After minification 87.8 kB
  • After compression 16.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 168.3 kB

  • Original 828.5 kB
  • After minification 828.5 kB
  • After compression 660.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.3 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 62.0 kB

  • Original 222.4 kB
  • After minification 222.4 kB
  • After compression 160.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intermarkrelocation.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (93%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intermark Relocation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

intermarkrelocation.ru accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

intermarkrelocation.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

intermarkrelocation.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intermarkrelocation.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intermarkrelocation.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intermark Relocation. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: