6.5 sec in total
500 ms
5.8 sec
203 ms
Welcome to intermarkrelocation.ru homepage info - get ready to check Intermark Relocation best content right away, or after learning these important things about intermarkrelocation.ru
Релокация людей и бизнеса, иммиграция, юридическое сопровождение, помощь в ВНЖ и ПМЖ, перевозка вещей и переезды, поиск жилья
Visit intermarkrelocation.ruWe analyzed Intermarkrelocation.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 500 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
intermarkrelocation.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value22.0 s
0/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value1,470 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.085
93/100
15%
Value22.3 s
1/100
10%
500 ms
718 ms
55 ms
931 ms
145 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Intermarkrelocation.ru, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.bitrix24.ru and 9% (7 requests) were made to Crm.intermarkrelocation.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.bitrix24.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 280.5 kB (26%)
1.1 MB
811.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Intermarkrelocation.ru main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 778.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 154.4 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intermarkrelocation.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.3 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (93%)
61
4
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intermark Relocation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intermarkrelocation.ru
500 ms
intermarkrelocation.ru
718 ms
gtm.js
55 ms
tag.js
931 ms
pz.css
145 ms
intranet-common.css
284 ms
ui.design-tokens.css
418 ms
bitrix24-design-tokens.css
420 ms
ui.font.opensans.css
423 ms
main.popup.bundle.css
421 ms
style.css
422 ms
style.css
430 ms
sidepanel.css
555 ms
core_date.css
559 ms
ui.buttons.bundle.css
560 ms
ui.switcher.bundle.css
561 ms
landing_public.css
561 ms
style.css
714 ms
popup.css
693 ms
catalog_cond.css
703 ms
style.css
699 ms
bootstrap.css
980 ms
theme.css
1257 ms
template_styles.css
829 ms
core.js
1532 ms
jquery-1.12.4.min.js
1119 ms
prostiezvonki.js
855 ms
pz.js
966 ms
jquery.noty.js
998 ms
bottomRight.js
1104 ms
default.js
1118 ms
protobuf.js
1566 ms
model.js
1241 ms
core_promise.js
1277 ms
rest.client.js
1327 ms
pull.client.js
1517 ms
core_fx.js
1462 ms
pageobject.js
1470 ms
main.popup.bundle.js
1603 ms
css2
1579 ms
core_clipboard.js
1663 ms
manager.js
1472 ms
slider.js
1374 ms
main.date.js
1256 ms
core_date.js
1373 ms
core_window.js
1466 ms
icon-base.css
1332 ms
core_tree.js
1375 ms
ui.buttons.bundle.js
1379 ms
ui.switcher.bundle.js
1257 ms
intersectionobserver.js
1402 ms
helper.js
1425 ms
showLangSelector.js
1439 ms
lazyload.js
1386 ms
script.js
1257 ms
script.js
1325 ms
1
138 ms
assets_webpack_21bd05b48e_1728398397.js
999 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
2223 ms
opensans-bold.woff
429 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
2355 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
2386 ms
opensans-semibold.woff
419 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
2495 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
2513 ms
opensans-regular.woff
285 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
2417 ms
opensans-light.woff
299 ms
loader_129_jfd5md.js
587 ms
call.tracker.js
587 ms
advert.gif
149 ms
polyfill.js
138 ms
app.js
138 ms
app.bundle.min.css
139 ms
app.bundle.min.js
414 ms
intermarkrelocation.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intermarkrelocation.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
intermarkrelocation.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intermarkrelocation.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Intermarkrelocation.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intermarkrelocation.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intermark Relocation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: