2.8 sec in total
92 ms
2.5 sec
220 ms
Visit internetseer.com now to see the best up-to-date Internetseer content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about internetseer.com
A website monitoring service offering 60 minute website monitoring and 20 minute web site monitoring and a free web site monitoring service.
Visit internetseer.comWe analyzed Internetseer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
internetseer.com performance score
92 ms
100 ms
53 ms
51 ms
299 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Internetseer.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 11% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (713 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 291.9 kB (53%)
553.8 kB
261.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Internetseer.com main page is 553.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 320.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Internetseer needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 209.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 209.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Internetseer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (47%)
58
31
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Internetseer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
internetseer.com
92 ms
index.xtp;jsessionid=a-DvzBLrdZ8g
100 ms
styles.css
53 ms
menu-styles.css
51 ms
34345.js
299 ms
urchin.js
30 ms
all.js
359 ms
gpt.js
19 ms
logo.jpg
10 ms
green_line.png
44 ms
login_button.gif
36 ms
activate_button_small.gif
43 ms
check.png
22 ms
table_free.png
43 ms
table_freetrial.png
41 ms
content_back.jpg
10 ms
left_col_bullet.gif
42 ms
right_col_break.gif
115 ms
activate_free_trial1.gif
116 ms
pubads_impl_83.js
55 ms
ads
371 ms
container.html
102 ms
db.php
247 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
riskfree.gif
41 ms
right_col_back.gif
20 ms
right_col_bottom_back.gif
32 ms
five_reasons.gif
106 ms
act-now.gif
126 ms
202 ms
xd_arbiter.php
278 ms
xd_arbiter.php
499 ms
expansion_embed.js
79 ms
osd.js
100 ms
5560320851139736447
91 ms
abg.js
111 ms
m_js_controller.js
123 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
34 ms
s
50 ms
x_button_blue2.png
27 ms
ping
81 ms
ui
135 ms
like_box.php
184 ms
xwWG67BZFLW.css
342 ms
92jR-n5wPxz.css
439 ms
SRSW8M763HA.js
585 ms
ullQFyhrQFI.js
713 ms
y97Ig99UVTs.js
577 ms
KHAtULXOQuz.js
575 ms
1185159_537255333013795_1595604459_n.jpg
304 ms
429142_288361981236466_1150689053_n.jpg
391 ms
1465192_10153332986287717_3100380547143039356_n.jpg
491 ms
12814221_749150351886782_6760123940955891139_n.jpg
571 ms
12745535_1579429405714298_5401948199045118089_n.jpg
572 ms
12963579_762774540523358_4517650572967035693_n.jpg
572 ms
12729079_190116574688532_411305655030743120_n.jpg
573 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
75 ms
1JLnMyDN79z.png
74 ms
activeview
18 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
78 ms
i8XO-4kv8i7.js
78 ms
internetseer.com SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Internetseer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Internetseer.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
internetseer.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Internetseer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: