14.4 sec in total
128 ms
13.7 sec
597 ms
Click here to check amazing Internet Service USA content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about internetserviceusa.com
Internet comparison services in Detroit MI. At Internet Service USA, we have over 10 years experience in the internet servicing industry. We specialize in informational internet and plan services in D...
Visit internetserviceusa.comWe analyzed Internetserviceusa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 14.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
internetserviceusa.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
39/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
128 ms
8994 ms
120 ms
34 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Internetserviceusa.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9 sec) belongs to the original domain Internetserviceusa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 350.8 kB (27%)
1.3 MB
930.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Internetserviceusa.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 551.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 276.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 48.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 276.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Internet Service USA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 28.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Internetserviceusa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (82%)
66
12
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Internet Service USA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
internetserviceusa.com
128 ms
internetserviceusa.com
8994 ms
main.min.css
120 ms
css
34 ms
frontend.css
178 ms
style.min.css
181 ms
index.css
4353 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
183 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
184 ms
frontend.min.css
184 ms
swiper.min.css
247 ms
e-swiper.min.css
239 ms
post-11.css
241 ms
frontend.min.css
372 ms
global.css
244 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
300 ms
post-1259.css
301 ms
spectra-block-positioning.min.css
316 ms
slick.min.css
317 ms
uag-css-1259.css
362 ms
post-1890.css
366 ms
post-1577.css
381 ms
css
29 ms
fontawesome.min.css
382 ms
solid.min.css
423 ms
brands.min.css
423 ms
jquery.min.js
432 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
437 ms
widget-spacer.min.css
390 ms
widget-heading.min.css
436 ms
widget-divider.min.css
435 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
447 ms
frontend.min.js
451 ms
dom-ready.min.js
450 ms
main.js
496 ms
spectra-block-positioning.min.js
495 ms
testimonial.min.js
507 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
510 ms
slick.min.js
511 ms
uag-js-1259.js
556 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
494 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
443 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
441 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
441 ms
hooks.min.js
492 ms
i18n.min.js
489 ms
frontend.min.js
442 ms
core.min.js
443 ms
frontend.min.js
441 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
608 ms
underscore.min.js
442 ms
wp-util.min.js
441 ms
wpforms.min.js
428 ms
frontend.min.js
429 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
437 ms
mailcheck.min.js
436 ms
punycode.min.js
423 ms
utils.min.js
422 ms
wpforms-modern.min.js
479 ms
Web-devices-amico-768x768+%281%29-1920w.png
156 ms
Channel_Linup.png+%281%29.webp
148 ms
pexels-photo-1054397.jpeg
219 ms
pexels-photo-5699834.jpeg
198 ms
network-cable-ethernet-computer-159304.jpeg
177 ms
pexels-photo-11114141.jpeg
177 ms
pexels-photo-2420212.jpeg
242 ms
testimonial-skip-01.jpeg
138 ms
submit-spin.svg
177 ms
desktop-X1zoom-out.jpg.webp
143 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAopxRSW3z.ttf
121 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRSW3z.ttf
134 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4QK1O4a0Fg.ttf
153 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4e6yO4a0Fg.ttf
154 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
223 ms
internetserviceusa.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
internetserviceusa.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
internetserviceusa.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Internetserviceusa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Internetserviceusa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
internetserviceusa.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Internet Service USA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: