Tools & Wizards About Us
internetvogue.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

internetvogue.com

internetvogue.com

Page Load Speed

18.9 sec in total

First Response

2.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

11.1 sec

internetvogue.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to internetvogue.com homepage info - get ready to check Internetvogue best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about internetvogue.com

Forsale Lander

Visit internetvogue.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Internetvogue.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 16.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

internetvogue.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,960 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

internetvogue.com

2127 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

361 ms

css

243 ms

style.css

449 ms

shortcodes.css

383 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Internetvogue.com, 17% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Internetvogue.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 692.7 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

820.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Internetvogue.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 679.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 20.0 kB

  • Original 25.5 kB
  • After minification 24.1 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 331 B

  • Original 679.9 kB
  • After minification 679.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Internetvogue images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 269.6 kB

  • Original 355.5 kB
  • After minification 298.6 kB
  • After compression 85.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 269.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 402.8 kB

  • Original 452.8 kB
  • After minification 400.1 kB
  • After compression 50.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Internetvogue.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 402.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Internetvogue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

internetvogue.com

internetvogue.com

2127 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

361 ms

css

css

243 ms

style.css

style.css

449 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

383 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

241 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

374 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

424 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

361 ms

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

250 ms

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

310 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1197 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

1198 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1189 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

284 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

1196 ms

frontend-builder-scripts.js

frontend-builder-scripts.js

1892 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1892 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

730 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

782 ms

014.jpg

014.jpg

730 ms

013.jpg

013.jpg

729 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

781 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

22 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

21 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

589 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

590 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

589 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

584 ms

Accessibility Review

internetvogue.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

internetvogue.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

internetvogue.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Internetvogue.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Internetvogue.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

internetvogue.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Internetvogue. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: