4.1 sec in total
835 ms
2.9 sec
326 ms
Click here to check amazing Interpan content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interpan.ru
Производственная Компания «Интерпан» начала свою деятельность в 2003 году. Более десяти лет компания не стояла на месте: она развивалась, разрабатывала новые решения в области декора, предоставляя сво...
Visit interpan.ruWe analyzed Interpan.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 835 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
interpan.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value24.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.231
54/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
835 ms
271 ms
268 ms
274 ms
280 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Interpan.ru, 9% (9 requests) were made to Cp.onicon.ru and 5% (5 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Interpan.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 751.2 kB (30%)
2.5 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Interpan.ru main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interpan images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 534.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 534.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interpan.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (34%)
95
63
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interpan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interpan.ru
835 ms
normalize.css
271 ms
prettyform.css
268 ms
styles.css
274 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
280 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
410 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
394 ms
colorbox.css
390 ms
bxslider.js
393 ms
jquery.prettyform.js
402 ms
jquery.flexisel.js
402 ms
centrizr.min.js
512 ms
printme.js
525 ms
scripts.js
517 ms
ga.js
26 ms
logo.png
281 ms
site_link_ico.png
127 ms
vkontakte.png
130 ms
facebook.png
131 ms
gkl-dekor-slider.jpg
668 ms
raschet.jpg
573 ms
top__block__pic5.png
266 ms
top_block_pic2.png
268 ms
top_block_pic1.png
270 ms
top_block_pic3.png
390 ms
771711641_7.jpg
396 ms
534631841_7.jpg
398 ms
logo-Interpan.jpg
411 ms
Interpan.png
635 ms
Sotrudnichestvo-2.jpg
525 ms
td__Interpan.png
655 ms
calc_pic.png
543 ms
title_block_sh_top.png
654 ms
1152847641_7.jpg
679 ms
1148804441_7.jpg
721 ms
1148029241_7.jpg
1003 ms
1110310641_7.jpg
908 ms
700882841_7.jpg
785 ms
520411641_7.jpg
789 ms
467242441_7.jpg
944 ms
464693641_7.jpg
831 ms
358455241_7.jpg
917 ms
406334841_7.jpg
916 ms
343444841_7.jpg
964 ms
239338841_7.jpg
1037 ms
2537776221_7.jpg
1173 ms
2384510421_7.jpg
1043 ms
896865641_7.jpg
1079 ms
3609298021_7.jpg
1101 ms
3065654821_7.jpg
1130 ms
gtm.js
55 ms
2687721621_7.jpg
1152 ms
hit
270 ms
__utm.gif
48 ms
watch.js
170 ms
simple_loader.js
404 ms
loader.js
188 ms
914197841_7.jpg
1052 ms
818208041_7.jpg
1094 ms
308336841_7.jpg
1113 ms
watch.js
463 ms
api.js
93 ms
308329241_7.jpg
996 ms
3166734421_7.jpg
1035 ms
3069860421_7.jpg
1029 ms
2731842021_7.jpg
1033 ms
hit
129 ms
95c9967c1a654a8462b885517b44887f.js
94 ms
2662609621_7.jpg
965 ms
2390718821_7.jpg
973 ms
2327708821_7.jpg
989 ms
2327626621_7.jpg
1013 ms
bootstrap.min.js
199 ms
2327457221_7.jpg
903 ms
logo_bot.png
912 ms
search_but.png
919 ms
cont_line_ico.gif
864 ms
top_block_name_bg.png
856 ms
right_col_bg.png
921 ms
special_item_bg.png
909 ms
bootstrap.min.js
97 ms
all_things_bg.png
899 ms
advert.gif
91 ms
list_marker.png
899 ms
onicon.site.min.css
97 ms
onicon.site.min.js
190 ms
sliders_controls.png
844 ms
loader.gif
851 ms
logo_shadow.png
836 ms
onicon.site.min.css
191 ms
1
92 ms
bm_bg.png
778 ms
bspopup-overlay.png
785 ms
overlay.png
834 ms
video_button_bg.png
815 ms
onicon.site.min.js
572 ms
border.png
801 ms
24795539
93 ms
controls.png
790 ms
bspopup-close.png
362 ms
hosts-2.js
97 ms
hosts-2.js
97 ms
interpan.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
interpan.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
interpan.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interpan.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interpan.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interpan.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interpan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: