4.8 sec in total
848 ms
3.8 sec
204 ms
Visit interparts.ru now to see the best up-to-date Interparts content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interparts.ru
Visit interparts.ruWe analyzed Interparts.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 848 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
interparts.ru performance score
848 ms
941 ms
331 ms
558 ms
357 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Interparts.ru, 4% (2 requests) were made to Counter.rambler.ru and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Interparts.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 98.2 kB (54%)
182.0 kB
83.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Interparts.ru main page is 182.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 69.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Interparts needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 36.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.7 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interparts.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (54%)
52
24
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interparts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
interparts.ru
848 ms
ip.css
941 ms
ajax.js
331 ms
ow.js
558 ms
cart.js
357 ms
utils.js
1248 ms
counter2.2.js
473 ms
top100.jcn
532 ms
yamoney_button.gif
406 ms
bg.jpg
382 ms
nippons.gif
375 ms
ZenithLogo.png
541 ms
ru.gif
155 ms
by.gif
153 ms
usa.gif
150 ms
pl.gif
380 ms
ipru.gif
537 ms
bannerru.gif
383 ms
login_divider.png
576 ms
li_item.png
578 ms
top_left_chat.png
570 ms
top_left_history.png
584 ms
top_left_balance.png
731 ms
btn_find.gif
733 ms
check.gif
776 ms
srch_bg.gif
787 ms
ico_news.gif
787 ms
s.gif
790 ms
ico_stat.gif
909 ms
qiwi.jpg
923 ms
ico_cats.gif
950 ms
jc.gif
963 ms
sct.gif
964 ms
rbi.gif
978 ms
Facebook.png
1830 ms
Livejournal.png
1196 ms
Twitter.png
1211 ms
zenlogo_small.png
1208 ms
ga.js
73 ms
inbg132.png
1184 ms
cb_off.png
1197 ms
btn_login.png
1357 ms
tab_sel.gif
1347 ms
tab_unsel.gif
1352 ms
0.04375994671136141
1356 ms
inbg.png
1347 ms
watch.js
3 ms
cnt
746 ms
kyCodVnuj0
206 ms
top100.scn
138 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
check_un.gif
1383 ms
vsep.gif
1389 ms
widget_ru_RU.js
259 ms
u8705.83.spylog.com
414 ms
cnt
294 ms
counter2
286 ms
interparts.ru SEO score
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interparts.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Interparts.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interparts.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interparts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: