Tools & Wizards About Us
interport.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

interport.us

Interport Logistics | International Logistics Provider

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

8 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

611 ms

interport.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Interport content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interport.us

Interport International Logistics Provider offers warehousing, distribution, consulting, etc for industries like hardware, retail, pharma and more.

Visit interport.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Interport.us page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interport.us performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,940 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.493

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interport.us

8 ms

interport.us

33 ms

autoptimize_b38ee94f84d03fa422671c5a5ba9af73.css

109 ms

autoptimize_3f7c82eaefdac14d59d2fbe02365aa93.css

30 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Interport.us, 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.html5maps.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Interport.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (37%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Interport.us main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 265.8 kB

  • Original 325.7 kB
  • After minification 322.8 kB
  • After compression 59.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 265.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interport images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 739.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 537 B

  • Original 178.2 kB
  • After minification 178.2 kB
  • After compression 177.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interport.us has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (47%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

interport.us

interport.us

8 ms

interport.us

interport.us

33 ms

autoptimize_b38ee94f84d03fa422671c5a5ba9af73.css

autoptimize_b38ee94f84d03fa422671c5a5ba9af73.css

109 ms

autoptimize_3f7c82eaefdac14d59d2fbe02365aa93.css

autoptimize_3f7c82eaefdac14d59d2fbe02365aa93.css

30 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

46 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

40 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

39 ms

autoptimize_single_104b09f0b97f3f41ff60beb32db5ef14.js

autoptimize_single_104b09f0b97f3f41ff60beb32db5ef14.js

47 ms

autoptimize_single_d1bcba91011dbeaf74f6a8d172d66003.js

autoptimize_single_d1bcba91011dbeaf74f6a8d172d66003.js

38 ms

autoptimize_single_ec2f6ea42da01e5399cd9dfa3992bd94.js

autoptimize_single_ec2f6ea42da01e5399cd9dfa3992bd94.js

45 ms

autoptimize_single_bb00d616760cfce661407dbbd6ea3798.js

autoptimize_single_bb00d616760cfce661407dbbd6ea3798.js

58 ms

autoptimize_single_44630912beb384daa69a9fa12f44df17.js

autoptimize_single_44630912beb384daa69a9fa12f44df17.js

59 ms

js

js

77 ms

raphael.min.js

raphael.min.js

91 ms

index.php

index.php

1195 ms

map.js

map.js

164 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

56 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

51 ms

jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.js

jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.js

62 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

67 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

66 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

66 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

72 ms

autoptimize_single_8367560b688f3f1b2e86af001988a20e.js

autoptimize_single_8367560b688f3f1b2e86af001988a20e.js

77 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

80 ms

autoptimize_single_509f0c36ef9fd46988ce37fbd6b78b2f.js

autoptimize_single_509f0c36ef9fd46988ce37fbd6b78b2f.js

78 ms

api.js

api.js

57 ms

2e6fe7d5d966f95f36251586fec432bb.min.js

2e6fe7d5d966f95f36251586fec432bb.min.js

161 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

78 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

81 ms

autoptimize_single_a678b3fd95e9130af0ea7d4d1f66a0da.js

autoptimize_single_a678b3fd95e9130af0ea7d4d1f66a0da.js

80 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

88 ms

autoptimize_single_ccdf893e7d8b26933af0c336bcc3943e.js

autoptimize_single_ccdf893e7d8b26933af0c336bcc3943e.js

88 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

45 ms

css

css

76 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

142 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

114 ms

mediaelement-and-player.js

mediaelement-and-player.js

116 ms

spotlight.js

spotlight.js

114 ms

Interpot-Logo.jpg

Interpot-Logo.jpg

107 ms

interport-header.jpg

interport-header.jpg

115 ms

slide1-mobile.jpg

slide1-mobile.jpg

106 ms

banner-video-img.jpg

banner-video-img.jpg

113 ms

personalized.jpg

personalized.jpg

107 ms

E-Commerce.png

E-Commerce.png

106 ms

foreign-trade.jpg

foreign-trade.jpg

106 ms

Jose-De.png

Jose-De.png

107 ms

warehousing-thumbnail.jpg

warehousing-thumbnail.jpg

108 ms

distribution-thumbnai1l.jpg

distribution-thumbnai1l.jpg

106 ms

freight.jpg

freight.jpg

107 ms

Customs-thum-thumbnail1.jpg

Customs-thum-thumbnail1.jpg

108 ms

Consulting-thum.jpg

Consulting-thum.jpg

107 ms

Information-thum.jpg

Information-thum.jpg

108 ms

Refrigerated-thum.jpg

Refrigerated-thum.jpg

109 ms

Kooyman.png

Kooyman.png

108 ms

Orgill.png

Orgill.png

110 ms

PSCi.png

PSCi.png

108 ms

sap.jpg

sap.jpg

109 ms

mustique.png

mustique.png

110 ms

inovatex.png

inovatex.png

112 ms

leagus.png

leagus.png

113 ms

FCBF.png

FCBF.png

111 ms

UnitedShipping.png

UnitedShipping.png

112 ms

ctpat.png

ctpat.png

112 ms

IFS.png

IFS.png

112 ms

AWI.png

AWI.png

113 ms

lang-arow.png

lang-arow.png

25 ms

mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_regular-1.woff

mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_regular-1.woff

20 ms

mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_alt_semibold.woff

mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_alt_semibold.woff

19 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

21 ms

mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_bold.woff

mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_bold.woff

6 ms

great_day_personal_use.woff

great_day_personal_use.woff

20 ms

proximanova-light-1.woff

proximanova-light-1.woff

21 ms

social-icon.png

social-icon.png

8 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

5 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

159 ms

close.png

close.png

157 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

19 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

19 ms

Accessibility Review

interport.us accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

interport.us best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

interport.us SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interport.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interport.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

interport.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interport. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: