Tools & Wizards About Us
interserver.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

interserver.com

InterServer - Affordable Unlimited Web Hosting, Cloud VPS and Dedicated Servers

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

884 ms

Page Rendered

464 ms

interserver.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Inter Server content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interserver.com

InterServer is a leading managed web hosting, Cloud VPS hosting, dedicated server and colocation provider. All with 24/7 support, competitive pricing and up-time guarantee.

Visit interserver.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interserver.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interserver.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.101

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interserver.com

40 ms

interserver.net

60 ms

www.interserver.net

653 ms

bootstrap.min.css

39 ms

font-awesome.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Interserver.com, 91% (58 requests) were made to Interserver.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (653 ms) relates to the external source Interserver.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

898.0 kB

After Optimization

873.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Interserver.com main page is 898.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 859.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 31.7 kB
  • After minification 31.6 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 859.0 kB
  • After minification 859.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inter Server images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (50%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inter Server. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

interserver.com

interserver.com

40 ms

interserver.net

interserver.net

60 ms

www.interserver.net

www.interserver.net

653 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

39 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

32 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

28 ms

index.css

index.css

27 ms

common.css

common.css

24 ms

nav.css

nav.css

50 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

23 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

51 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

71 ms

webh.webp

webh.webp

24 ms

net.png

net.png

19 ms

boost-web.png

boost-web.png

69 ms

prohosting.png

prohosting.png

20 ms

vps-h.png

vps-h.png

33 ms

windows-vps.png

windows-vps.png

34 ms

wordpress-vps.png

wordpress-vps.png

40 ms

bread-bas.png

bread-bas.png

72 ms

storage.png

storage.png

72 ms

dedicated-s.png

dedicated-s.png

72 ms

large-storage.png

large-storage.png

90 ms

10gpb.png

10gpb.png

103 ms

gpu.png

gpu.png

87 ms

deploy.png

deploy.png

72 ms

colocation.png

colocation.png

88 ms

aboutus.png

aboutus.png

89 ms

network.png

network.png

89 ms

datacenter.png

datacenter.png

90 ms

our-team.png

our-team.png

103 ms

review.png

review.png

127 ms

login.svg

login.svg

103 ms

supportslide.png

supportslide.png

233 ms

dc.png

dc.png

235 ms

zayo.png

zayo.png

233 ms

gtt.png

gtt.png

235 ms

cognet.png

cognet.png

235 ms

tiscali.png

tiscali.png

236 ms

inter.png

inter.png

236 ms

host.png

host.png

237 ms

dedicated-slide.png

dedicated-slide.png

236 ms

paths.png

paths.png

237 ms

advannce-dos.png

advannce-dos.png

260 ms

arrow2.png

arrow2.png

259 ms

arrow1.png

arrow1.png

263 ms

asp.svg

asp.svg

252 ms

new-arrow.png

new-arrow.png

256 ms

vps-special.svg

vps-special.svg

249 ms

js

js

47 ms

checklist-blue.svg

checklist-blue.svg

63 ms

guarantee.svg

guarantee.svg

59 ms

renewal-cost.svg

renewal-cost.svg

22 ms

migrations.svg

migrations.svg

29 ms

uptime.svg

uptime.svg

60 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

60 ms

fast.svg

fast.svg

51 ms

support.svg

support.svg

70 ms

inter-team.jpg

inter-team.jpg

127 ms

payment-method-footer.svg

payment-method-footer.svg

109 ms

rocketchat-livechat.min.js

rocketchat-livechat.min.js

68 ms

main.js

main.js

9 ms

Accessibility Review

interserver.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

interserver.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

interserver.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interserver.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interserver.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

interserver.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inter Server. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: