Tools & Wizards About Us
intersoft-electronics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

intersoft-electronics.com

Intersoft Electronics

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

756 ms

intersoft-electronics.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Intersoft Electronics content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intersoft-electronics.com

Welcome to the Intersoft Electronics website. Get to know everything about the best radar technology, upgrades and services for CNS systems.

Visit intersoft-electronics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intersoft-electronics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intersoft-electronics.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.154

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intersoft-electronics.com

362 ms

intersoft-electronics.com

1838 ms

global.css

94 ms

frontend_blocks.css

188 ms

frontend_blocks_responsive.css

270 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Intersoft-electronics.com, 16% (7 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 14% (6 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Intersoft-electronics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 107.6 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intersoft-electronics.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 899.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 105.9 kB

  • Original 131.2 kB
  • After minification 129.9 kB
  • After compression 25.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 899.4 kB
  • After minification 899.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intersoft Electronics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 245 B

  • Original 59.1 kB
  • After minification 59.1 kB
  • After compression 58.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 115.5 kB
  • After minification 115.5 kB
  • After compression 114.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intersoft-electronics.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (62%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intersoft Electronics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intersoft-electronics.com

intersoft-electronics.com

362 ms

intersoft-electronics.com

intersoft-electronics.com

1838 ms

global.css

global.css

94 ms

frontend_blocks.css

frontend_blocks.css

188 ms

frontend_blocks_responsive.css

frontend_blocks_responsive.css

270 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

47 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

53 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

54 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

276 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

278 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

279 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

280 ms

blocks.style.css

blocks.style.css

280 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

451 ms

admin-frontend.min.css

admin-frontend.min.css

365 ms

style.css

style.css

366 ms

search-forms.css

search-forms.css

369 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

373 ms

forminator.min.css

forminator.min.css

372 ms

getwid.min.css

getwid.min.css

455 ms

stackable.min.css

stackable.min.css

455 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

52 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

52 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

50 ms

plausible.outbound-links.file-downloads.js

plausible.outbound-links.file-downloads.js

156 ms

index.css

index.css

661 ms

frontend.blocks.js

frontend.blocks.js

679 ms

main.js

main.js

679 ms

e-202431.js

e-202431.js

52 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

685 ms

electronics_home.png

electronics_home.png

1353 ms

intersoft-electronics-logo-white.svg

intersoft-electronics-logo-white.svg

147 ms

intersoft-electronics-logo.svg

intersoft-electronics-logo.svg

139 ms

intersoft-electronics-logo-white-inverse.svg

intersoft-electronics-logo-white-inverse.svg

136 ms

radar-sunset-homepage.jpg

radar-sunset-homepage.jpg

402 ms

graph.svg

graph.svg

141 ms

intersoft-electronics-logo-white-no-spacing-1.svg

intersoft-electronics-logo-white-no-spacing-1.svg

148 ms

canso-logo-white.svg

canso-logo-white.svg

226 ms

services_home.png

services_home.png

1198 ms

manufacturing_home.png

manufacturing_home.png

1221 ms

SkyRF_sunset.jpeg

SkyRF_sunset.jpeg

117 ms

RASS8_toolbox.png

RASS8_toolbox.png

77 ms

IMG_2772-Copy.jpeg

IMG_2772-Copy.jpeg

126 ms

ie-academy-logo.jpg

ie-academy-logo.jpg

131 ms

Accessibility Review

intersoft-electronics.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

intersoft-electronics.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

intersoft-electronics.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intersoft-electronics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intersoft-electronics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intersoft-electronics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intersoft Electronics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: