6.4 sec in total
454 ms
5.7 sec
219 ms
Visit intertec.com.au now to see the best up-to-date Intertec content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about intertec.com.au
Intertec specialises in the design and development of dynamic web sites, corporate applications and solutions for eCommerce, eBusiness and eLearning using the
Visit intertec.com.auWe analyzed Intertec.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 454 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
intertec.com.au performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value15.9 s
0/100
10%
Value4,360 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.416
23/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
454 ms
1212 ms
236 ms
457 ms
651 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Intertec.com.au, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Intertec.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 82.0 kB (8%)
1.1 MB
985.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Intertec.com.au main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 812.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intertec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intertec.com.au needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (62%)
71
27
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intertec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intertec.com.au
454 ms
intertec.com.au
1212 ms
style.css
236 ms
widget.css
457 ms
layerslider.css
651 ms
styles.css
653 ms
font-awesome.css
64 ms
css
27 ms
fonts.css
653 ms
peter-river.css
654 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
655 ms
nivo-slider.css
675 ms
easy-nivo-slider.css
868 ms
jquery.js
1307 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
879 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1093 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
878 ms
jquerytransit.js
900 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1089 ms
ai.js
1101 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
1100 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
1111 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1379 ms
scripts.js
1378 ms
core.min.js
1379 ms
widget.min.js
1379 ms
accordion.min.js
1380 ms
tabs.min.js
1525 ms
init.js
1528 ms
debouncedresize.js
1530 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1537 ms
nicescroll.min.js
1753 ms
flexslider-min.js
1548 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1744 ms
fitvids.js
1745 ms
isotope.min.js
1748 ms
carouFredSel.min.js
1972 ms
easing.min.js
1794 ms
touchSwipe.min.js
1964 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1960 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1714 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
collect
12 ms
logo21.png
460 ms
dark-bg.png
1049 ms
2013-portfolio-images-280x275.jpg
1056 ms
barra-portfolio-280x275.jpg
1255 ms
mortons1-280x275.jpg
1256 ms
2013-portfolio-images-ses-280x275.jpg
1094 ms
2013-portfolio-images-55x55.jpg
831 ms
barra-portfolio-55x55.jpg
1051 ms
mortons1-55x55.jpg
1289 ms
2013-portfolio-images-ses-55x55.jpg
1289 ms
wamc-55x55.jpg
1290 ms
jorgensen-55x55.jpg
1313 ms
bocol-55x55.jpg
1476 ms
mode-living2-55x55.jpg
1475 ms
banner1_a.jpg
459 ms
banner1_b.png
457 ms
start.jpg
456 ms
water.jpg
459 ms
ipad.png
459 ms
face.png
723 ms
rss.png
723 ms
SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf
17 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
19 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
19 ms
title-bg.png
1451 ms
call-bg.jpg
1884 ms
bottom-bg.jpg
1891 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
48 ms
logo21.png
919 ms
start.jpg
1573 ms
banner1_b.png
2213 ms
banner1_a.jpg
1358 ms
water.jpg
1145 ms
ipad.png
2002 ms
skin.css
896 ms
in.png
876 ms
logosm.png
1093 ms
rss.png
1101 ms
face.png
1312 ms
blank.gif
221 ms
skin.png
437 ms
loading.gif
221 ms
intertec.com.au accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intertec.com.au best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
intertec.com.au SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intertec.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intertec.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intertec.com.au
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intertec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: