Tools & Wizards About Us
intertg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

intertg.com

Affordable IT Services | IT Support | Sydney | Free Health Check

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

466 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

166 ms

intertg.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intertg.com homepage info - get ready to check Intertg best content right away, or after learning these important things about intertg.com

Affordable and Certified • IT Services • IT Support • IT Consultancy • 10 minutes Response Time • No Lock-ins • Flexible Plans • Call 1300 305 588

Visit intertg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intertg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 466 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intertg.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.intertg.com

466 ms

default.aspx

203 ms

default.aspx

1045 ms

Website.css

208 ms

WebResource.axd

413 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Intertg.com, 28% (15 requests) were made to S3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com and 19% (10 requests) were made to R.secure.mycms.com.au. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source S3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 285.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intertg.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 22.5 kB

  • Original 34.8 kB
  • After minification 31.9 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intertg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 237.2 kB

  • Original 395.9 kB
  • After minification 377.0 kB
  • After compression 158.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 237.2 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 3.5 kB
  • After minification 3.5 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intertg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (33%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intertg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.intertg.com

www.intertg.com

466 ms

default.aspx

default.aspx

203 ms

default.aspx

default.aspx

1045 ms

Website.css

Website.css

208 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

413 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

627 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

1192 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

1001 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

840 ms

MyCMSLayoutController.js

MyCMSLayoutController.js

854 ms

selectivizr-1.0.2.min.js

selectivizr-1.0.2.min.js

855 ms

jquery.cycle.all.js

jquery.cycle.all.js

871 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

872 ms

EurostileLTStd-BoldEx2.js

EurostileLTStd-BoldEx2.js

872 ms

EurostileLTStd-Demi.font.js

EurostileLTStd-Demi.font.js

1036 ms

EurostileLTStd.js

EurostileLTStd.js

1051 ms

FrutigerLTStd-Bold.font.js

FrutigerLTStd-Bold.font.js

1051 ms

Frutiger75-Black.js

Frutiger75-Black.js

1058 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

18 ms

MyCMSLayoutController.js

MyCMSLayoutController.js

16 ms

selectivizr-1.0.2.min.js

selectivizr-1.0.2.min.js

15 ms

jquery.cycle.all.js

jquery.cycle.all.js

3 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

5 ms

EurostileLTStd-BoldEx2.js

EurostileLTStd-BoldEx2.js

866 ms

EurostileLTStd-Demi.font.js

EurostileLTStd-Demi.font.js

3 ms

EurostileLTStd.js

EurostileLTStd.js

429 ms

FrutigerLTStd-Bold.font.js

FrutigerLTStd-Bold.font.js

685 ms

Frutiger75-Black.js

Frutiger75-Black.js

5 ms

logo.png

logo.png

217 ms

Great-IT-System.jpg

Great-IT-System.jpg

1692 ms

Uptime-resized.jpg

Uptime-resized.jpg

1072 ms

cloud-resized.jpg

cloud-resized.jpg

1061 ms

oldvnew-resized.jpg

oldvnew-resized.jpg

1306 ms

skills-resized.jpg

skills-resized.jpg

1076 ms

what-our-clients-say-resized.jpg

what-our-clients-say-resized.jpg

1259 ms

Amazon-Google-Apps-Home-Page.jpg

Amazon-Google-Apps-Home-Page.jpg

1725 ms

follow-us-on-facebook30X30.png

follow-us-on-facebook30X30.png

1303 ms

follow-us-on-twitter30X30.png

follow-us-on-twitter30X30.png

1295 ms

follow-us-on-linkedin30X30.png

follow-us-on-linkedin30X30.png

1495 ms

follow-us-on-googleplus30X30.png

follow-us-on-googleplus30X30.png

1533 ms

Customer%20login.png

Customer%20login.png

1526 ms

REDCROSS-RESIZED.jpg

REDCROSS-RESIZED.jpg

1788 ms

RSPCA-RESIZED.jpg

RSPCA-RESIZED.jpg

1977 ms

unrefugee-logo325pix.jpg

unrefugee-logo325pix.jpg

1740 ms

digerati.png

digerati.png

215 ms

ga.js

ga.js

64 ms

call.png

call.png

209 ms

arrow-blue-small.png

arrow-blue-small.png

203 ms

btn-action2.png

btn-action2.png

206 ms

arrow-blue.png

arrow-blue.png

411 ms

arrow-yellow.png

arrow-yellow.png

421 ms

arrow-red.png

arrow-red.png

418 ms

arrow-green.png

arrow-green.png

425 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

intertg.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

intertg.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

intertg.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intertg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intertg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intertg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intertg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: