Tools & Wizards About Us
intertour.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

intertour.ru

InterTour" - туроператор: Италия, Болгария, Финляндия, Египет, ОАЭ, Норвегия, Япония, Португалия, Тайланд

Page Load Speed

24.3 sec in total

First Response

494 ms

Resources Loaded

23.6 sec

Page Rendered

286 ms

intertour.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intertour.ru homepage info - get ready to check Inter Tour best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about intertour.ru

InterTour" - туроператор: Италия, Болгария, Финляндия, Египет, ОАЭ, Норвегия, Япония, Португалия, Тайланд

Visit intertour.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Intertour.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 494 ms and then it took 23.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

intertour.ru performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value890 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.065

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intertour.ru

494 ms

www.intertour.ru

543 ms

www.intertour.ru

979 ms

template_a8980beb3d52bf914c986e2ef1794ff3_v1.css

142 ms

logo-sign.png

332 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Intertour.ru, 18% (10 requests) were made to Leadback.ru and 11% (6 requests) were made to Static.cloudim.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Intertourru.push.world.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 141.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intertour.ru main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 128.4 kB

  • Original 157.0 kB
  • After minification 143.7 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 313 B

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inter Tour images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 174.1 kB
  • After minification 174.0 kB
  • After compression 163.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 42.6 kB
  • After minification 42.6 kB
  • After compression 40.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intertour.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (59%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inter Tour. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intertour.ru

intertour.ru

494 ms

www.intertour.ru

www.intertour.ru

543 ms

www.intertour.ru

www.intertour.ru

979 ms

template_a8980beb3d52bf914c986e2ef1794ff3_v1.css

template_a8980beb3d52bf914c986e2ef1794ff3_v1.css

142 ms

logo-sign.png

logo-sign.png

332 ms

logo-label.png

logo-label.png

446 ms

jqueryui.js

jqueryui.js

321 ms

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

26 ms

template_43c85354c61a0c65e9237049715e017b_v1.js

template_43c85354c61a0c65e9237049715e017b_v1.js

816 ms

tag.js

tag.js

1137 ms

iconset.png

iconset.png

546 ms

loader.svg

loader.svg

410 ms

loader-mini.svg

loader-mini.svg

368 ms

loader-color.svg

loader-color.svg

386 ms

Acrom-Regular.woff

Acrom-Regular.woff

579 ms

Acrom-Bold.woff

Acrom-Bold.woff

956 ms

Acrom-Medium.woff

Acrom-Medium.woff

325 ms

Verdana-Bold.woff

Verdana-Bold.woff

955 ms

Acrom-ExtraBold.woff

Acrom-ExtraBold.woff

439 ms

ba.js

ba.js

363 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

121 ms

leadback.js

leadback.js

835 ms

https.embed.js

https.embed.js

20255 ms

pervaya_liniya_life_energy_resort_sankt_peterburg_jk_288461220_6.jpg

pervaya_liniya_life_energy_resort_sankt_peterburg_jk_288461220_6.jpg

628 ms

prielbruse.jpg

prielbruse.jpg

379 ms

velikobritaniya_viza.jpg

velikobritaniya_viza.jpg

243 ms

pic-default-country-1920-500.jpg

pic-default-country-1920-500.jpg

791 ms

armeniya.jpg

armeniya.jpg

650 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

collect

collect

4 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

514 ms

js

js

70 ms

bx_stat

bx_stat

187 ms

1

1

136 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

widget_uuid.php

widget_uuid.php

112 ms

widget_data.php

widget_data.php

225 ms

chat.js

chat.js

760 ms

_assets.min.js

_assets.min.js

102 ms

widget_event.php

widget_event.php

232 ms

widget_widget.php

widget_widget.php

241 ms

css

css

28 ms

chat.css

chat.css

148 ms

cobrowsing.css

cobrowsing.css

150 ms

115 ms

widget2.css

widget2.css

752 ms

ua-parser.min.js

ua-parser.min.js

778 ms

_chat_socket.min.js

_chat_socket.min.js

1107 ms

watch.js

watch.js

0 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

103 ms

im_enter.png

im_enter.png

102 ms

cloudim-chat-label.png

cloudim-chat-label.png

102 ms

default.png

default.png

103 ms

online.php

online.php

203 ms

leadback-chat-api.js

leadback-chat-api.js

205 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

104 ms

1

1

252 ms

Accessibility Review

intertour.ru accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

intertour.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

intertour.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intertour.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intertour.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intertour.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inter Tour. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: