10.9 sec in total
4.7 sec
5.9 sec
321 ms
Visit interviewgirl.com now to see the best up-to-date Interview Girl content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interviewgirl.com
InterviewGirl.com - Changing the World One Story at a Time - Subscribe to InterviewGirl.com’s Newsletter InterviewGirl.com: A movement to eliminate misery in the world Who is Interview… read mo...
Visit interviewgirl.comWe analyzed Interviewgirl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.7 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
interviewgirl.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.175
69/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
4693 ms
92 ms
120 ms
151 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Interviewgirl.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Paypal.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) relates to the external source Interviewgirl.org.
Page size can be reduced by 49.8 kB (80%)
62.3 kB
12.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Interviewgirl.com main page is 62.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 62.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (77%)
64
15
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interview Girl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interviewgirl.org
4693 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
92 ms
reset.css
120 ms
style.css
151 ms
basic.css
160 ms
headers.css
163 ms
bootstrap.css
163 ms
shortcodes.css
169 ms
flexslider.css
188 ms
prettyPhoto.css
227 ms
style.css
252 ms
skeleton.css
238 ms
responsive.css
248 ms
styles.css
259 ms
styles.css
260 ms
simply-instagram.css
310 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
393 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
345 ms
jquery.ck.js
332 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
348 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
375 ms
ninjapopups.js
382 ms
flowplayer.min.js
434 ms
simply-instagram-jquery.prettyPhoto.js
443 ms
easing.js
446 ms
fitvids.js
456 ms
wide-rounded.css
457 ms
flowplayer.css
504 ms
js
25 ms
comment-reply.min.js
545 ms
jquery.form.min.js
554 ms
scripts.js
546 ms
shortcodes.js
546 ms
bootstrap.js
547 ms
superfish.js
589 ms
mobilemenu.js
586 ms
waypoints.js
611 ms
waypoints-sticky.js
517 ms
functions.js
499 ms
prettyPhoto.js
483 ms
jquery.tweet.min.js
537 ms
widgets.js
37 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
65 ms
pixel.gif
68 ms
twitter.png
212 ms
facebook.png
211 ms
skype.png
211 ms
google.png
211 ms
instagram.png
212 ms
youtube.png
230 ms
pinterest.png
261 ms
rss.png
264 ms
search.png
286 ms
stripes.png
290 ms
wide-rounded.gif
283 ms
bkg-3x1024.png
236 ms
home_diagram.jpg
230 ms
logo2.png
213 ms
white.png
169 ms
interviewgirl.jpg
165 ms
ajax-loader.gif
186 ms
no_play_white.png
228 ms
toggle.png
224 ms
retina.css
82 ms
interviewgirl.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
interviewgirl.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
interviewgirl.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interviewgirl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interviewgirl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interviewgirl.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interview Girl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: