Tools & Wizards About Us
interwood.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

interwood.in

Interwood | Modular Kitchen and Wardrobes | Bangalore

Page Load Speed

9 sec in total

First Response

423 ms

Resources Loaded

8.3 sec

Page Rendered

335 ms

interwood.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to interwood.in homepage info - get ready to check Interwood best content right away, or after learning these important things about interwood.in

Book Your Consultation We Craft Modular Experience For Beautiful Indian Homes Kitchen Wardrobes Kitchens Bedrooms YOUR JOURNEY WITH INTERWOOD Visit Us Come visit us and let us give you the Ultimate so...

Visit interwood.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Interwood.in page load time and found that the first response time was 423 ms and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interwood.in performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value16,820 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interwood.in

423 ms

interwood.in

3240 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

429 ms

main.min.css

573 ms

css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Interwood.in, 16% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Interwood.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 200.3 kB (79%)

Content Size

254.0 kB

After Optimization

53.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Interwood.in main page is 254.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 226.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 189.2 kB

  • Original 226.7 kB
  • After minification 220.7 kB
  • After compression 37.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 189.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 11.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Interwood needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 49% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (80%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interwood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

interwood.in

interwood.in

423 ms

interwood.in

interwood.in

3240 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

429 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

573 ms

css

css

34 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

592 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

602 ms

styles.css

styles.css

429 ms

contact-form-7-main.min.css

contact-form-7-main.min.css

453 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

585 ms

groovy-28328.css

groovy-28328.css

600 ms

groovy-69018.css

groovy-69018.css

611 ms

groovy-socicon.css

groovy-socicon.css

626 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

629 ms

font-internal.css

font-internal.css

652 ms

automator.css

automator.css

773 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

799 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

805 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1025 ms

post-307.css

post-307.css

827 ms

jet-blog.css

jet-blog.css

854 ms

jet-tabs-frontend.css

jet-tabs-frontend.css

960 ms

post-7300.css

post-7300.css

999 ms

preset_7712.css

preset_7712.css

1003 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

1028 ms

text-animations.min.css

text-animations.min.css

1056 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1338 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1200 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

1193 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

1222 ms

css

css

24 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1226 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

1256 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1386 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1401 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1422 ms

js

js

69 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

72 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

1494 ms

Tracker.js

Tracker.js

149 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1581 ms

intl-tel-input.min.css

intl-tel-input.min.css

1579 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1844 ms

index.js

index.js

1376 ms

index.js

index.js

1272 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

1468 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

1403 ms

particles.js

particles.js

1402 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

1380 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

1298 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

1405 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

1389 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

1379 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

1414 ms

vimeo.min.js

vimeo.min.js

1391 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1264 ms

jquery-numerator.min.js

jquery-numerator.min.js

1388 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1398 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1394 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1373 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1282 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1242 ms

jet-tabs-frontend.min.js

jet-tabs-frontend.min.js

1369 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1379 ms

modal-popups.min.js

modal-popups.min.js

1393 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1369 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1249 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1241 ms

jet-blog.min.js

jet-blog.min.js

1339 ms

jquery.intl-tel-input.min.js

jquery.intl-tel-input.min.js

1376 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1366 ms

jquery.inputmask.min.js

jquery.inputmask.min.js

1518 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

1246 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

1232 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

197 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

195 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

160 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

1199 ms

logo-1-117x64.png

logo-1-117x64.png

1187 ms

AMAZE-A.webp

AMAZE-A.webp

1606 ms

RAL-6004-KITCHEN.webp

RAL-6004-KITCHEN.webp

1617 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

176 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

211 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

209 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

206 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

206 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

209 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

209 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

213 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

213 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

213 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1216 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

213 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

213 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

213 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

258 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

259 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

258 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

258 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

258 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

258 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1393 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

148 ms

ads

ads

93 ms

crane-font.woff

crane-font.woff

1180 ms

spinner-32.svg

spinner-32.svg

1214 ms

GLAZE-WR-ED.webp

GLAZE-WR-ED.webp

2833 ms

time-liner-1.png

time-liner-1.png

1323 ms

AdobeStock_427455215.webp

AdobeStock_427455215.webp

1561 ms

time-liner-2.png

time-liner-2.png

1433 ms

3.-ALNO-PAGE.webp

3.-ALNO-PAGE.webp

1609 ms

designing.webp

designing.webp

1625 ms

1.-ANDREA-MAIN-WARDROBE.webp

1.-ANDREA-MAIN-WARDROBE.webp

1424 ms

Untitled-1.webp

Untitled-1.webp

1659 ms

closeup-view-handshake-two-businessmen-suits-shaking-hands.webp

closeup-view-handshake-two-businessmen-suits-shaking-hands.webp

1599 ms

submit-spin.svg

submit-spin.svg

1603 ms

MAIN-PAGE-KITCHEN.webp

MAIN-PAGE-KITCHEN.webp

1918 ms

Accessibility Review

interwood.in accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

interwood.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

interwood.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interwood.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interwood.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

interwood.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interwood. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: