Tools & Wizards About Us
intex.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

intex.us

Walls & Ceilings Since 1989 | Intex International

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

314 ms

intex.us screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intex.us homepage info - get ready to check Intex best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about intex.us

Intex International is engaged in the design and manufacturing of the complete system of tools, equipment, and accessories for the Walls and Ceilings industry.

Visit intex.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Intex.us page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intex.us performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value77.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value31.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,590 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.414

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value64.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intex.us

1128 ms

jquery.min.js

353 ms

scrolltopcontrol.js

261 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

366 ms

coin-slider.min.js

265 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Intex.us and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Intex.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 345.3 kB (39%)

Content Size

876.0 kB

After Optimization

530.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intex.us main page is 876.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 423.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 29.5 kB
  • After minification 27.8 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 423.6 kB
  • After minification 400.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intex images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 241.9 kB

  • Original 354.9 kB
  • After minification 333.5 kB
  • After compression 113.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 241.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 55.9 kB

  • Original 68.1 kB
  • After minification 49.1 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intex.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (48%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intex.us

intex.us

1128 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

353 ms

scrolltopcontrol.js

scrolltopcontrol.js

261 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

366 ms

coin-slider.min.js

coin-slider.min.js

265 ms

coin-slider-styles.css

coin-slider-styles.css

245 ms

style.css

style.css

261 ms

grid.css

grid.css

342 ms

theme.css

theme.css

381 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

383 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

383 ms

style.css

style.css

468 ms

style.css

style.css

467 ms

style.css

style.css

468 ms

style.css

style.css

488 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

686 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

499 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

687 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

591 ms

jquery.customSelect.min.js

jquery.customSelect.min.js

592 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

589 ms

custom.js

custom.js

592 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

700 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

716 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

716 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

715 ms

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

775 ms

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

776 ms

script.js

script.js

803 ms

script.js

script.js

925 ms

client.js

client.js

925 ms

DBS-Fonts.css

DBS-Fonts.css

455 ms

body.png

body.png

110 ms

mail.png

mail.png

111 ms

phone.png

phone.png

111 ms

menu.png

menu.png

112 ms

a2-760x400.jpg

a2-760x400.jpg

282 ms

677321-760x400.jpg

677321-760x400.jpg

194 ms

68319-760x400.jpg

68319-760x400.jpg

680 ms

57470_enl.jpg

57470_enl.jpg

313 ms

551.500x500.JPG

551.500x500.JPG

225 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

318 ms

above-ground-metal-frame-swimming-pools-61225-7270891.jpg

above-ground-metal-frame-swimming-pools-61225-7270891.jpg

291 ms

download%20%282%29.jpg

download%20%282%29.jpg

389 ms

download.jpg

download.jpg

387 ms

zamek-kojec-trampolina-do-skakania-intex-48259-2-3373037379.jpg

zamek-kojec-trampolina-do-skakania-intex-48259-2-3373037379.jpg

390 ms

naduvnoj_matras_intex_68757_c1.jpg

naduvnoj_matras_intex_68757_c1.jpg

533 ms

matelas-gonflable-152-x-203-cm-intex-66962-m-152x20-literie.56505003-90399180.jpg

matelas-gonflable-152-x-203-cm-intex-66962-m-152x20-literie.56505003-90399180.jpg

474 ms

I57426_-157x200.jpg

I57426_-157x200.jpg

529 ms

515Ly-1aFDL-180x180.jpg

515Ly-1aFDL-180x180.jpg

575 ms

57105-01_11_14_23_42_34-0_l-180x180.jpg

57105-01_11_14_23_42_34-0_l-180x180.jpg

575 ms

48674-1-500x500-180x180.jpg

48674-1-500x500-180x180.jpg

577 ms

31157589.3yqd5hil1m-180x126.jpg

31157589.3yqd5hil1m-180x126.jpg

621 ms

48620_prd_2014_150_1-180x169.jpg

48620_prd_2014_150_1-180x169.jpg

647 ms

503de58e890cc_intex68797campingmat-180x180.jpg

503de58e890cc_intex68797campingmat-180x180.jpg

674 ms

68678-500x500-180x180.jpg

68678-500x500-180x180.jpg

673 ms

intex-68574-poltrona-con-tp_6404742896039583736f-180x177.jpg

intex-68574-poltrona-con-tp_6404742896039583736f-180x177.jpg

674 ms

48508_1524-180x120.jpg

48508_1524-180x120.jpg

712 ms

Intex-64474-PremAire-Queen-Size-Raised-Airbed-with-Built-in-Electric-Pump--180x180.jpg

Intex-64474-PremAire-Queen-Size-Raised-Airbed-with-Built-in-Electric-Pump--180x180.jpg

740 ms

64414a-180x180.jpg

64414a-180x180.jpg

766 ms

images1.jpg

images1.jpg

777 ms

DBS-MjCasablanca.woff

DBS-MjCasablanca.woff

770 ms

DBS-BYekan.woff

DBS-BYekan.woff

786 ms

Accessibility Review

intex.us accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

intex.us best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

intex.us SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intex.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Persian language. Our system also found out that Intex.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intex.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: