Tools & Wizards About Us
intona.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

intona.eu

Products

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

564 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

220 ms

intona.eu screenshot

About Website

Visit intona.eu now to see the best up-to-date Intona content for Argentina and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about intona.eu

Signal Processing Devices, Made in Germany

Visit intona.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Intona.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 564 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intona.eu performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intona.eu

564 ms

352 ms

bootstrap.min.css

25 ms

std.css

193 ms

jquery.min.js

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Intona.eu, 14% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Intona.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 338.7 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

926.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intona.eu main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 10.5 kB
  • After minification 10.5 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 314.5 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 918.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Intona needs image optimization as it can save up to 314.5 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 16.4 kB
  • After minification 12.9 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intona.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intona. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

intona.eu

intona.eu

564 ms

352 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

25 ms

std.css

std.css

193 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

36 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

41 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

289 ms

card.css

card.css

302 ms

logo_color_w.svg

logo_color_w.svg

98 ms

7055c_catalog-1.jpg

7055c_catalog-1.jpg

440 ms

7055b_catalog-1.jpg

7055b_catalog-1.jpg

396 ms

7055d_catalog-1.jpg

7055d_catalog-1.jpg

387 ms

7054_catalog.jpg

7054_catalog.jpg

579 ms

7054-x_catalog.jpg

7054-x_catalog.jpg

579 ms

in8062b_anim-1.gif

in8062b_anim-1.gif

1065 ms

poesy_catalog2.jpg

poesy_catalog2.jpg

583 ms

ethdbg_catalog.jpg

ethdbg_catalog.jpg

685 ms

4053-x_conn_dash_r-1.png

4053-x_conn_dash_r-1.png

638 ms

intona_forum-1.gif

intona_forum-1.gif

867 ms

picoscope4262iso.gif

picoscope4262iso.gif

677 ms

push.php

push.php

672 ms

Accessibility Review

intona.eu accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

intona.eu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

intona.eu SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intona.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intona.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intona.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intona. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: