3.5 sec in total
78 ms
3.4 sec
55 ms
Click here to check amazing INTRACON content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intracon.com
Motivate your audience to do more by embedding your product or solution’s value into training. Intracon delivers customized trainings tailored to your needs.
Visit intracon.comWe analyzed Intracon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
intracon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
55/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value4.6 s
70/100
10%
Value540 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
78 ms
41 ms
40 ms
1418 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Intracon.com, 47% (31 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 23% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 389.3 kB (46%)
839.4 kB
450.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Intracon.com main page is 839.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 467.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 362.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 362.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, INTRACON needs image optimization as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (28%)
46
33
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INTRACON. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.intracon.com
78 ms
minified.js
41 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
40 ms
polyfill.min.js
1418 ms
js
72 ms
thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js
64 ms
main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js
67 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
63 ms
lodash.min.js
65 ms
react.production.min.js
64 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
66 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
65 ms
86eef0_d788f77156f74d73a8982d01b1037051f000.jpg
307 ms
86eef0_e6e5dbba4504429f8f2820882577328f~mv2.png
303 ms
86eef0_e6e5dbba4504429f8f2820882577328f~mv2.png
355 ms
86eef0_1c561d51f705452e9dce110e3577a94b~mv2.png
371 ms
86eef0_fd1ccae4fa114e47a6f104414e1d9d99~mv2.png
399 ms
icon_training_WHT.png
363 ms
86eef0_08ddd2a0d0a34dc098f19cfb9d7b2120~mv2_d_1200_1200_s_2.png
553 ms
86eef0_40dc56aeacaa44fbaf64196c47dce2e7~mv2_d_1200_1200_s_2.png
483 ms
86eef0_10b9846613744a40afa6f1b0124d8ce0~mv2_d_1200_1200_s_2.png
633 ms
86eef0_4709369e80294add9f412fc1a1fbb4d7~mv2.png
541 ms
86eef0_bb0928fc462243c4beaccbdc4fe58da2~mv2.png
533 ms
86eef0_e2c54fe05b794ddb8085273a966e06c6~mv2.png
584 ms
86eef0_ed2da929af8244a7b6dd29c009b27033~mv2.png
702 ms
86eef0_0de0b0b2566144d2bfb883b6e8bfd00c~mv2.png
735 ms
86eef0_030e0aa417d6479396841ab48380caec~mv2.png
735 ms
86eef0_686f7bf7c2c94c10ba87fc1f11ea9e5d~mv2.png
759 ms
logo-kofax-blue.png
746 ms
86eef0_47827d6d510e4edb8fa8ae994427bc28~mv2.png
814 ms
86eef0_0e0d582e012b42b5b3ad50b17830cff3~mv2.png
862 ms
86eef0_091800b82c7e49c0a0b7902cd9fdd4be~mv2.jpg
920 ms
86eef0_51baed2bc0d148e8aec5203aee7480d7~mv2.png
989 ms
frankfurt.jpg
961 ms
low_160507_IntraconFakes_LQ_134_jpg.jpg
989 ms
low_Livestreaming.jpg
1028 ms
low_20150308_TechU_0022.jpg
1104 ms
low_vlcsnap-2016-08-26-15h05m55s100.jpg
1284 ms
86eef0_2cf503cfce6b4afa8f04559e92f65f0a~mv2.jpg
1228 ms
js
109 ms
analytics.js
88 ms
bundle.min.js
55 ms
file.woff
842 ms
file.woff
847 ms
file.woff
848 ms
file.woff
848 ms
129 ms
131 ms
133 ms
131 ms
129 ms
127 ms
169 ms
168 ms
169 ms
167 ms
165 ms
165 ms
collect
52 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
19 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
14 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
3 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
4 ms
intracon.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
intracon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
intracon.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intracon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intracon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intracon.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INTRACON. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: