Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

793 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

268 ms

intrepidtravelogue.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Intrepidtravelogue content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intrepidtravelogue.com

Travels both intrepid and trepidatious, around the world and around the block.

Visit intrepidtravelogue.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intrepidtravelogue.com page load time and found that the first response time was 793 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intrepidtravelogue.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,770 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intrepidtravelogue.com

793 ms

style.css

231 ms

dkirw.css

128 ms

slider.css

188 ms

jquery.js

361 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Intrepidtravelogue.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (902 ms) belongs to the original domain Intrepidtravelogue.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 828.6 kB (26%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Intrepidtravelogue.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 41.8 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 119.3 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intrepidtravelogue images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 633.5 kB

  • Original 918.3 kB
  • After minification 888.8 kB
  • After compression 284.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 633.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 36.4 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intrepidtravelogue.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (45%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

46

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intrepidtravelogue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

intrepidtravelogue.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

intrepidtravelogue.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

intrepidtravelogue.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intrepidtravelogue.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Intrepidtravelogue.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intrepidtravelogue. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: