3.8 sec in total
388 ms
2.9 sec
498 ms
Visit invisiblegrail.com now to see the best up-to-date Invisible Grail content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about invisiblegrail.com
Online and face-to-face we create experiential and imaginative approaches to professional development in universities.
Visit invisiblegrail.comWe analyzed Invisiblegrail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 388 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
invisiblegrail.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value21.3 s
0/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.14
79/100
15%
Value21.6 s
1/100
10%
388 ms
748 ms
193 ms
284 ms
288 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Invisiblegrail.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Static.hotjar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Invisiblegrail.com.
Page size can be reduced by 341.7 kB (7%)
4.8 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Invisiblegrail.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Invisible Grail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 159.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 159.8 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Invisiblegrail.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (56%)
78
34
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Invisible Grail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
invisiblegrail.com
388 ms
www.invisiblegrail.com
748 ms
style.min.css
193 ms
blocks.style.build.css
284 ms
all.min.css
288 ms
slick.min.css
297 ms
slick-theme.min.css
293 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
298 ms
blocks.style.css
398 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
375 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
380 ms
css
38 ms
style.min.css
478 ms
aos.css
389 ms
style.css
393 ms
style-main-new.min.css
470 ms
style.css
393 ms
css
20 ms
css
29 ms
smartslider.min.css
406 ms
css
28 ms
jquery.min.js
508 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
410 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
484 ms
n2.min.js
486 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
495 ms
ss-simple.min.js
501 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
598 ms
w-bullet.min.js
600 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
598 ms
modal.js
599 ms
frontend.blocks.js
614 ms
hooks.min.js
615 ms
i18n.min.js
614 ms
url.min.js
675 ms
api-fetch.min.js
685 ms
ultp.min.js
688 ms
byline.334a.min.js
698 ms
ig.js
706 ms
aos.js
705 ms
frontend.js
774 ms
slick.min.js
781 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
681 ms
forms.js
614 ms
ajax-forms.js
610 ms
IG-long-logo-600x200-jpg.jpg
291 ms
headerimg.jpg
424 ms
jonas-jaeken-9x2l1o67wx0-unsplash-square-small.jpg
706 ms
marcello-gennari-768083-unsplash-1-1.jpg
432 ms
daniel-olah-1074953-unsplash-1500x1000-1.jpg
735 ms
han-lahandoe-GkjabALRTN0-unsplash-1980x500-1.jpg
559 ms
headerimg.jpg
369 ms
jonas-jaeken-9x2l1o67wx0-unsplash-square-small.jpg
469 ms
marcello-gennari-768083-unsplash-1-1.jpg
519 ms
Orange-image-resized.jpg
527 ms
han-lahandoe-GkjabALRTN0-unsplash-1980x500-1.jpg
570 ms
speech-marks-2.png
616 ms
han-lahandoe-GkjabALRTN0-unsplash-1980x500-1.jpg
1103 ms
diane-helentjaris-6lhOGX0EobE-unsplash-1.jpg
953 ms
skyline-2619944_1920-e1513068063525-1.jpg
865 ms
ian-dooley-DuBNA1QMpPA-unsplash-2.jpg
989 ms
client-logos_0008_Layer-1-300x71.png
802 ms
client-logos_0007_Layer-2-300x180.png
780 ms
client-logos_0006_Layer-3-300x139.png
847 ms
client-logos_0005_Layer-4-300x137.png
876 ms
client-logos_0004_Layer-5-300x161.png
911 ms
2ADCC7_0_0.woff
936 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
959 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
995 ms
client-logos_0003_Layer-6-300x211.png
1029 ms
client-logos_0002_Layer-8-286x300.png
971 ms
client-logos_0001_Layer-10-300x113.png
960 ms
client-logos_0000_Layer-7-258x300.png
980 ms
DurhamUniversityMasterLogo_RGB-300x124.png
993 ms
hotjar-1151529.js
135 ms
DTU_Logo-1.png
998 ms
london-met-uni-300x71.png
977 ms
newman-300x102.png
945 ms
yorkshire-300x117.png
940 ms
twitter.png
203 ms
linkedin.png
194 ms
d5fe5ed680aeba683e2c07521.js
70 ms
embed.js
41 ms
invisiblegrail.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
invisiblegrail.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
invisiblegrail.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Invisiblegrail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Invisiblegrail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
invisiblegrail.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Invisible Grail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: