7 sec in total
387 ms
5.3 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Invisible Touch content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about invisibletouch.lt
Be healthy by choosing natural materials clothes and accessories. At Invisible Touch all products handmade and unique. We go for comfort and quality
Visit invisibletouch.ltWe analyzed Invisibletouch.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 387 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
invisibletouch.lt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.346
32/100
15%
Value6.3 s
60/100
10%
387 ms
1109 ms
3121 ms
480 ms
290 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Invisibletouch.lt, 24% (23 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to App.convertful.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Invisibletouch.lt.
Page size can be reduced by 185.7 kB (39%)
478.5 kB
292.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Invisibletouch.lt main page is 478.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 262.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 166.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Invisible Touch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 961 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (92%)
62
5
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Invisible Touch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
invisibletouch.lt
387 ms
invisibletouch.lt
1109 ms
autoptimize_b35b1a9c823baa7ed8038d760c60cae6.css
3121 ms
jquery.min.js
480 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
290 ms
frontend.js
290 ms
polyfills.min.js
479 ms
core.min.js
383 ms
mouse.min.js
388 ms
slider.min.js
388 ms
front-vendor.min.js
483 ms
underscore.min.js
486 ms
wp-util.min.js
486 ms
accounting.min.js
578 ms
plugin.min.js
674 ms
v4-shims.min.js
582 ms
frontend.js
585 ms
lazysizes.min.js
493 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
586 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
589 ms
js.cookie.min.js
592 ms
woocommerce.min.js
591 ms
mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js
680 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
685 ms
theme.min.js
689 ms
drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js
688 ms
drop-down-search.min.js
688 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
776 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
783 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
881 ms
ow-slider.min.js
787 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
787 ms
scroll-top.min.js
873 ms
select.min.js
882 ms
woo-custom-features.min.js
885 ms
Convertful.js
87 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
884 ms
woo-mini-cart.min.js
974 ms
general.min.js
979 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
789 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
790 ms
forms.js
696 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
783 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
786 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
700 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
699 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
694 ms
hooks.min.js
782 ms
i18n.min.js
785 ms
frontend.min.js
699 ms
waypoints.min.js
692 ms
swiper.min.js
884 ms
share-link.min.js
781 ms
dialog.min.js
696 ms
frontend.min.js
790 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
886 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
783 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
784 ms
frontend.min.js
794 ms
lazyload.min.js
790 ms
webfont.js
78 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
213 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
624 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
212 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
212 ms
eicons.woff
385 ms
l-01.png
201 ms
1-262-scaled-pxcvzgnmw0if4k9c8nm0986770hqyiib28dhuhpf8o.jpg
569 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
474 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
296 ms
css
28 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
24 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
43 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
41 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
44 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
43 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
43 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
44 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
44 ms
iJWKBXyXfDDVXbnBrXk.ttf
46 ms
iJWHBXyXfDDVXbEyjmmd8WU.ttf
46 ms
iJWHBXyXfDDVXbFqj2md8WU.ttf
45 ms
iJWHBXyXfDDVXbEOjGmd8WU.ttf
79 ms
iJWHBXyXfDDVXbEeiWmd8WU.ttf
46 ms
iJWHBXyXfDDVXbF6iGmd8WU.ttf
77 ms
iJWHBXyXfDDVXbFmi2md8WU.ttf
44 ms
3Jn5SD_-ynaxmxnEfVHPIG0CduA.ttf
79 ms
3JnkSD_-ynaxmxnEfVHPIGXxVfBE8Os.ttf
77 ms
3JnkSD_-ynaxmxnEfVHPIGWpVPBE8Os.ttf
96 ms
3JnkSD_-ynaxmxnEfVHPIGXNV_BE8Os.ttf
95 ms
3JnkSD_-ynaxmxnEfVHPIGXdUvBE8Os.ttf
77 ms
3JnkSD_-ynaxmxnEfVHPIGW5U_BE8Os.ttf
120 ms
3JnkSD_-ynaxmxnEfVHPIGWlUPBE8Os.ttf
121 ms
invisibletouch.lt accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
invisibletouch.lt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
invisibletouch.lt SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Invisibletouch.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Invisibletouch.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
invisibletouch.lt
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Invisible Touch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: