Tools & Wizards About Us
iphygital.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

iphygital.in

Digital Business Cards, Digital Showroom, Phygital Solution - iPhygital.ai

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

469 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

379 ms

iphygital.in screenshot

About Website

Visit iphygital.in now to see the best up-to-date IPhygital content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about iphygital.in

We offer digital business cards, digital showroom and Phygital solution. Elevate your business phygitally with our iPhygital, iEdge (digital business cards) and iAugment (Digital Showroom) products.

Visit iphygital.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Iphygital.in page load time and found that the first response time was 469 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

iphygital.in performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

iphygital.in

469 ms

SendEmailCamp.js

232 ms

header.css

418 ms

footer.css

463 ms

bootstrap.min.css

940 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Iphygital.in, 8% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Snap.licdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Iphygital.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 171.0 kB (44%)

Content Size

393.2 kB

After Optimization

222.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Iphygital.in main page is 393.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 211.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 67.8 kB

  • Original 76.6 kB
  • After minification 39.4 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.2 kB, which is 49% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 44.1 kB
  • After minification 44.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IPhygital images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 84.4 kB

  • Original 211.9 kB
  • After minification 211.8 kB
  • After compression 127.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.4 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 60.6 kB
  • After minification 60.6 kB
  • After compression 41.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iphygital.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (49%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IPhygital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

iphygital.in

iphygital.in

469 ms

SendEmailCamp.js

SendEmailCamp.js

232 ms

header.css

header.css

418 ms

footer.css

footer.css

463 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

940 ms

homepage.css

homepage.css

458 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

465 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

477 ms

js

js

60 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

835 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

925 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

694 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

1198 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

69 ms

logo.png

logo.png

249 ms

Virtual-Showroom.webp

Virtual-Showroom.webp

249 ms

Digital-business-Card.webp

Digital-business-Card.webp

417 ms

Visual-Commerce.webp

Visual-Commerce.webp

457 ms

3D-Development.webp

3D-Development.webp

686 ms

about.webp

about.webp

444 ms

Delivering-Excellence.png

Delivering-Excellence.png

465 ms

Science-and-Emotions.png

Science-and-Emotions.png

466 ms

Collaborative-Approach.png

Collaborative-Approach.png

626 ms

Virtual-Car-Showroom-02.webp

Virtual-Car-Showroom-02.webp

675 ms

sun-shadow-right.png

sun-shadow-right.png

686 ms

Visual-Commerce-sml.webp

Visual-Commerce-sml.webp

692 ms

Digital-card.webp

Digital-card.webp

696 ms

3D-Development-CreativeImage.webp

3D-Development-CreativeImage.webp

835 ms

icns-facebook.svg

icns-facebook.svg

905 ms

icn-linked-in.svg

icn-linked-in.svg

913 ms

icn-instagram.svg

icn-instagram.svg

915 ms

48 ms

Montserrat-Medium.woff

Montserrat-Medium.woff

1154 ms

Montserrat-Thin.woff

Montserrat-Thin.woff

1160 ms

Montserrat-SemiBold.woff

Montserrat-SemiBold.woff

1264 ms

mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_alt_regular-webfont.woff

mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_alt_regular-webfont.woff

1031 ms

js

js

55 ms

destination

destination

91 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

41 ms

ij7l7sjfrd

ij7l7sjfrd

90 ms

08497831-7cba-42e0-bad0-a33912f9497c.js

08497831-7cba-42e0-bad0-a33912f9497c.js

190 ms

insight.beta.min.js

insight.beta.min.js

48 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

15 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

189 ms

Virtual-Showroom.webp

Virtual-Showroom.webp

818 ms

6si.min.js

6si.min.js

40 ms

header-responsive.css

header-responsive.css

391 ms

c.gif

c.gif

8 ms

Accessibility Review

iphygital.in accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

iphygital.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

iphygital.in SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iphygital.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Iphygital.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

iphygital.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IPhygital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: