2.8 sec in total
194 ms
1.9 sec
656 ms
Click here to check amazing Ips Us content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ips-us.com
Calibration Services in California by IPS. ISO Accredited Calibration, serving Orange County, San Diego, and San Carlos. Call (650)595-7890.
Visit ips-us.comWe analyzed Ips-us.com page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
ips-us.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value19.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
194 ms
37 ms
79 ms
102 ms
115 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Ips-us.com, 23% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) belongs to the original domain Ips-us.com.
Page size can be reduced by 94.0 kB (4%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Ips-us.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ips Us images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 79 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (89%)
80
9
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ips Us. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ips-us.com
194 ms
css
37 ms
all.css
79 ms
styles.css
102 ms
everest-forms.css
115 ms
perfect-columns.css
114 ms
main.css
112 ms
font-awesome.min.css
152 ms
tpg-block.min.css
137 ms
style.css
143 ms
elements.css
209 ms
bootstrap.min.css
196 ms
style.css
156 ms
themify-icons.css
186 ms
style.css
188 ms
wpd-style.css
202 ms
saasland-gutenberg.css
202 ms
style.css
232 ms
frontend.css
254 ms
elementor-override.css
244 ms
animate.css
252 ms
saasland-animations.css
245 ms
magnific-popup.css
250 ms
footer.css
277 ms
responsive.css
306 ms
responsive-2.css
296 ms
swiper.css
299 ms
post-4883.css
302 ms
frontend.css
343 ms
simple-line-icons.css
321 ms
slick-theme.css
342 ms
themify-icons.css
340 ms
flaticon.css
357 ms
post-4881.css
355 ms
post-6509.css
362 ms
post-6518.css
383 ms
ekiticons.css
400 ms
js
65 ms
pixel.js
34 ms
widget-styles.css
410 ms
responsive.css
315 ms
jquery.js
372 ms
jquery-migrate.js
302 ms
main.js
352 ms
wow.min.js
352 ms
appart-custom.js
327 ms
main.js
325 ms
index.js
317 ms
index.js
427 ms
propper.js
397 ms
bootstrap.min.js
394 ms
jquery.parallax-scroll.js
384 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
384 ms
custom-wp.js
384 ms
frontend-script.js
370 ms
widget-scripts.js
355 ms
jquery.smartmenus.js
344 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.js
342 ms
webpack.runtime.js
336 ms
frontend-modules.js
336 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.js
328 ms
regenerator-runtime.js
340 ms
wp-polyfill.js
331 ms
hooks.js
318 ms
i18n.js
331 ms
frontend.js
336 ms
waypoints.js
322 ms
core.js
332 ms
frontend.js
329 ms
elements-handlers.js
332 ms
animate-circle.min.js
329 ms
elementor.js
341 ms
jquery.sticky.js
323 ms
lazyload.js
322 ms
2017_09_07_0577.jpg
359 ms
2017_10_23_0217-scaled.jpg
309 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
46 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
56 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
56 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
55 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
55 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
55 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
56 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
57 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
58 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
58 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
58 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
56 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
57 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
80 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
80 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
80 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
80 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
80 ms
LDIqapSCOBt_aeQQ7ftydoa05efelJoy.woff
81 ms
LDIqapSCOBt_aeQQ7ftydoa0gebelJoy.woff
83 ms
LDIqapSCOBt_aeQQ7ftydoa0reHelJoy.woff
81 ms
LDI1apSCOBt_aeQQ7ftydoa8XsLN.woff
82 ms
LDIqapSCOBt_aeQQ7ftydoa09eDelJoy.woff
82 ms
LDIqapSCOBt_aeQQ7ftydoa0kePelJoy.woff
82 ms
International-Process-Solutions-Logo-01-1024x573.png
69 ms
2017_09_07_0397-e1617499800700.jpg
45 ms
2017_09_07_0435-e1617499905863.jpg
47 ms
2017_09_07_0080-e1617499851218.jpg
50 ms
International-Process-Solutions-Logo-01.png
97 ms
ips-us.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ips-us.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ips-us.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ips-us.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ips-us.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ips-us.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ips Us. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: