Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

iptq.com

Insulin Potentiation Therapy - IPT - Alternative Cancer Chemotherapy that is Gentle Without Side Effects

Page Load Speed

21.5 sec in total

First Response

185 ms

Resources Loaded

21 sec

Page Rendered

253 ms

iptq.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to iptq.com homepage info - get ready to check IPT Q best content right away, or after learning these important things about iptq.com

IPTQ, the original & largest website about IPT (Insulin Potentiation Therapy)since 1998. Is IPT a better treatment for cancer, arthritis, infectious, cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurological dise...

Visit iptq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Iptq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 21.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

iptq.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

iptq.com

185 ms

r

78 ms

liferinglogos.gif

78 ms

ipt7iv-meds_small.jpg

150 ms

d1cameo_vsml.jpg

154 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Iptq.com, 8% (1 request) were made to Altavista.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Search.yahoo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source .

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 23.4 kB (60%)

Content Size

38.9 kB

After Optimization

15.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Iptq.com main page is 38.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 29.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 22.2 kB

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 24.5 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 9.8 kB
  • After minification 8.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IPT Q needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IPT Q. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

iptq.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

iptq.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

iptq.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iptq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Iptq.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IPT Q. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: