7.1 sec in total
223 ms
6.4 sec
434 ms
Visit iranreview.org now to see the best up-to-date Iranreview content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about iranreview.org
Visit iranreview.orgWe analyzed Iranreview.org page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
iranreview.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.173
69/100
15%
Value5.0 s
77/100
10%
223 ms
3393 ms
50 ms
2196 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Iranreview.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Iranreview.org.
Page size can be reduced by 244.9 kB (51%)
480.9 kB
236.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Iranreview.org main page is 480.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 199.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.9 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Iranreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 128.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iranreview.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (61%)
79
31
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Iranreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
iranreview.org
223 ms
www.iranreview.org
3393 ms
box.css
50 ms
frontOffice01.css
2196 ms
frontOffice02.css
50 ms
pager.css
53 ms
agahMenu.css
53 ms
form.css
74 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
2477 ms
jquery.bgiframe-2.1.1.js
74 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
2226 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
2238 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
2238 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
203 ms
jquery.ui.position.min.js
228 ms
jquery.ui.dialog.min.js
253 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
277 ms
common.js
300 ms
en.js
325 ms
dialog.js
350 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.2.css
397 ms
scrollable-fade.css
422 ms
WebResource.axd
440 ms
ScriptResource.axd
562 ms
ScriptResource.axd
613 ms
scrollable.min.js
592 ms
scrollable.fade.js
617 ms
scrollable.autoscroll.min.js
642 ms
scrollable.navigator.min.js
667 ms
toolbox.mousewheel.min.js
691 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.pack.js
621 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css
644 ms
bd-bg.gif
27 ms
logo.gif
92 ms
rss.png
27 ms
searchCommand.gif
40 ms
f9cdf5be-f4a3-4886-b1b4-34adae4e9816.jpg
52 ms
cf7fac1e-91ea-49fb-8606-4f1a030b4503.jpg
95 ms
cfbb0033-a8ef-4cbb-a5f5-dbb4a981b98d.jpg
52 ms
9ac05232-e4df-4e70-98d5-cb3d620f1e23.jpg
92 ms
ca127453-b618-410c-a2c6-983414fd68c6.jpg
112 ms
bcf8f05b-20f7-4e59-b969-0ae851ceea87.jpg
90 ms
16be8aad-3b0b-44d5-aff0-05b4f7fd6357.jpg
92 ms
3df1489b-2b46-4cad-abb1-be02491357f3.jpg
119 ms
bottomShadow.png
109 ms
5150f7e1-c26a-4464-b1b6-4f269318a68e.jpg
149 ms
c47d8528-b36d-41a9-bc68-049edec12029.jpg
112 ms
8ed1db44-2bcf-4abd-8a04-c2e8afab79f8.jpg
163 ms
89442cb5-6c54-4a97-9e9c-2d00da1f29d1.jpg
150 ms
1e0dc91b-d009-413d-839d-91bf4f2c23b9.jpg
163 ms
0b1c9a77-f4f5-4ff0-999b-9fc98c6af911.jpg
148 ms
90684366-a561-42b3-8516-e50439f3f39d.jpg
167 ms
sendArticle.jpg
173 ms
8e3d269c-fa08-4bdf-b41b-b3bd5159fdda.jpg
164 ms
80d55947-8d4b-449e-91b7-eecaee46533d.jpg
179 ms
bc44a447-646a-435b-9af9-df24df872d94.jpg
193 ms
3c6dc158-ec3a-4586-a5f8-4d220a06f7ac.jpg
198 ms
f8f612c0-5801-4b5b-8aa2-e6a7a9ce0615.jpg
197 ms
9938e01f-8e56-4979-9815-3e4ac038f376.jpg
204 ms
cb10f438-18f4-4926-82a0-4fcd8adb3bde.jpg
200 ms
46be436a-0183-4895-80a8-40a12d67eea1.jpg
206 ms
eb5e25fb-fc95-4104-b320-54c1ebf05eab.jpg
221 ms
bf0e6a4e-b146-49e2-a292-3f74ea93dbaa.jpg
223 ms
designAndDevelopAgahSystemLogo_en.png
247 ms
firstPix.jpg
412 ms
mainnav-bg.gif
202 ms
arrowRed.gif
203 ms
subnav-bg-wide.gif
216 ms
search-bg-wide.gif
218 ms
leftMenuTitleBackground.gif
222 ms
mostPopularTitleBackground.gif
212 ms
arrow.png
224 ms
container-bg.gif
221 ms
mainbody-bg.gif
191 ms
seprator.gif
192 ms
readon.gif
192 ms
articleSeprator.gif
207 ms
ga.js
28 ms
footerBackground.gif
205 ms
frontOffice02.css
195 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
iranreview.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
iranreview.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
iranreview.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iranreview.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Iranreview.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
iranreview.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Iranreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: