1.6 sec in total
120 ms
1.2 sec
275 ms
Click here to check amazing Ironton Vision content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about irontonvision.com
If you are looking for an eye doctor in Ironton, OH, contact Ironton Vision Center. Schedule an appointment with an optometrist for an eye exam now!
Visit irontonvision.comWe analyzed Irontonvision.com page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
irontonvision.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.429
22/100
15%
Value23.1 s
1/100
10%
120 ms
22 ms
42 ms
58 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Irontonvision.com, 32% (25 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (9 requests) were made to Files.hellonetcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (579 ms) relates to the external source Elocallink.tv.
Page size can be reduced by 990.5 kB (70%)
1.4 MB
426.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Irontonvision.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 144.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ironton Vision needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 773.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 773.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irontonvision.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 67.7 kB or 53% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (84%)
49
8
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ironton Vision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
irontonvision.com
120 ms
choices.min.css
22 ms
intl-tel-input.min.css
42 ms
richtext.min.css
58 ms
content.min.css
60 ms
wpforms-classic-full.min.css
30 ms
style.css
40 ms
all.min.js
57 ms
bootstrap-icons.css
23 ms
mind_loader.php
357 ms
jquery.min.js
96 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
52 ms
scripts.min.js
100 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
56 ms
jquery.mobile.js
96 ms
common.js
96 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
96 ms
gtm.js
264 ms
logo.png
351 ms
579 ms
widget.js
314 ms
et-divi-dynamic-7-late.css
25 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff
253 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
267 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAA.woff
273 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf
300 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff
286 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
300 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff
300 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
273 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAA.woff
298 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
299 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxM.woff
299 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf
310 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ABc-.woff
100 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ABc9.ttf
101 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu52xM.woff
91 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu52xP.ttf
100 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjARc-.woff
100 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjARc9.ttf
101 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrIzQ.woff
119 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrIzc.ttf
119 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBhc-.woff
121 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBhc9.ttf
122 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBBc-.woff
121 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBBc9.ttf
119 ms
modules.woff
56 ms
mind_rs_prd.php
66 ms
widget_app_base_1731405450658.js
18 ms
mind_local.css
22 ms
mind_jsn_chk_av.php
45 ms
br.php
92 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
css
41 ms
gocast_combined_g16.css
49 ms
x-64.png
71 ms
info-64t.png
22 ms
nx_proxy.php
51 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
9 ms
css
30 ms
all.min.css
16 ms
video.6.13.0.js
233 ms
video-js.min.6.13.0.css
106 ms
jquery.min.js
13 ms
videojs-contextmenu-ui.css
11 ms
rt-videojs-playlist-ui.css
11 ms
videojs-ie8.min.js
14 ms
videojs-playlist.min.js
14 ms
videojs-playlist-ui.min.js
22 ms
videojs-contextmenu.min.js
23 ms
videojs-contextmenu-ui.min.js
24 ms
CustomCCButton.js
69 ms
videojs-resolution-switcher-v7_20210303.js
103 ms
videojs-resolution-switcher-v7.css
90 ms
KolorWheel.min.js
93 ms
SharePanel.js
105 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
27 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
43 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
34 ms
irontonvision.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
irontonvision.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
irontonvision.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irontonvision.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Irontonvision.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
irontonvision.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ironton Vision. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: