Tools & Wizards About Us
irsg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

irsg.com

Inventory Processing & Transport Solutions - IRSG - Division of Pipp Mobile Storage Systems

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

irsg.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing IRSG content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about irsg.com

Customize, optimize, & organize with our versatile retail inventory processing products & transport solutions. Call 800-822-4264 today!

Visit irsg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Irsg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

irsg.com performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value88.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value72,040 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.37

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value105.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

irsg.com

1946 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

561 ms

pipp.js

91 ms

underscore.js

115 ms

selectivizr-min.js

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Irsg.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Irsg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (49%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Irsg.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 56.1 kB

  • Original 67.3 kB
  • After minification 61.9 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 77.9 kB

  • Original 940.9 kB
  • After minification 863.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IRSG images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 930.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 974.6 kB
  • After compression 266.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 930.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 42.8 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irsg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (27%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IRSG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

irsg.com

irsg.com

1946 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

jquery-1.7.1.js

561 ms

pipp.js

pipp.js

91 ms

underscore.js

underscore.js

115 ms

selectivizr-min.js

selectivizr-min.js

90 ms

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

84 ms

reset.css

reset.css

97 ms

style.css

style.css

116 ms

ie.css

ie.css

110 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

150 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

117 ms

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

188 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

140 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

122 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

143 ms

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

335 ms

gradient-bg.png

gradient-bg.png

71 ms

011312_irsg_logo.png

011312_irsg_logo.png

80 ms

hero_table_03-2-(1).png

hero_table_03-2-(1).png

72 ms

cart_hero_02.jpg

cart_hero_02.jpg

71 ms

hero_table_3.png

hero_table_3.png

497 ms

hero_table_02-2x.png

hero_table_02-2x.png

71 ms

cart_hero_04.jpg

cart_hero_04.jpg

923 ms

cart_hero_03.jpg

cart_hero_03.jpg

465 ms

cart_hero_01.jpg

cart_hero_01.jpg

623 ms

cart_hero_05x.png

cart_hero_05x.png

545 ms

hero_table_01.jpg

hero_table_01.jpg

1076 ms

hero_table_02-(1).jpg

hero_table_02-(1).jpg

911 ms

irsg-product-guide-badge.jpg

irsg-product-guide-badge.jpg

1068 ms

2016-irsg-gs-badge-irsg-final-rs2.jpg

2016-irsg-gs-badge-irsg-final-rs2.jpg

733 ms

thumb_wire.jpg

thumb_wire.jpg

729 ms

transporters.jpg

transporters.jpg

800 ms

thumb_racks.jpg

thumb_racks.jpg

857 ms

thumb_hanger_management_systems.jpg

thumb_hanger_management_systems.jpg

858 ms

thumb_casters.jpg

thumb_casters.jpg

908 ms

thumb_tables.jpg

thumb_tables.jpg

914 ms

thumb_carts.jpg

thumb_carts.jpg

998 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

937 ms

linkedin-icon.png

linkedin-icon.png

945 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

951 ms

youtube-icon.png

youtube-icon.png

963 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

898 ms

top-quick-nav-bg.png

top-quick-nav-bg.png

907 ms

button-bg.png

button-bg.png

920 ms

nav-bg.png

nav-bg.png

928 ms

homepage-featured-products-gradient.png

homepage-featured-products-gradient.png

911 ms

blue-arrow-right.png

blue-arrow-right.png

928 ms

blue-arrow-right-dark.png

blue-arrow-right-dark.png

932 ms

neuzeitgrot_bold-webfont.woff

neuzeitgrot_bold-webfont.woff

971 ms

hero-slideshow-controls-sprite.png

hero-slideshow-controls-sprite.png

872 ms

neuzeitgrot-webfont.woff

neuzeitgrot-webfont.woff

911 ms

Accessibility Review

irsg.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

irsg.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

irsg.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irsg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Irsg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

irsg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IRSG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: