Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

isea2015.org

One moment, please...

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

550 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

208 ms

isea2015.org screenshot

About Website

Visit isea2015.org now to see the best up-to-date Isea 2015 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about isea2015.org

Jitu slot88 merupakan situs slot online jituslot dengan member mencapai ribuan yang telah menjadi situs slot online terpecercara dengan winrate slot teritinggi dan juga telah menghadirkan berbagai ma...

Visit isea2015.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Isea2015.org page load time and found that the first response time was 550 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

isea2015.org performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

isea2015.org

550 ms

v0.js

27 ms

amp-carousel-0.1.js

44 ms

amp-sidebar-0.1.js

45 ms

amp-anim-0.1.js

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Isea2015.org, 67% (6 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (550 ms) belongs to the original domain Isea2015.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 79.1 kB (36%)

Content Size

221.5 kB

After Optimization

142.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Isea2015.org main page is 221.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 152.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 58.3 kB

  • Original 69.0 kB
  • After minification 55.9 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 152.5 kB
  • After minification 152.5 kB
  • After compression 131.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (71%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Isea 2015. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

isea2015.org accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

isea2015.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

isea2015.org SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    ID

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Isea2015.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Isea2015.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: